Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Creative writing courses and murder: I don't like Mondays

By Malcolm King - posted Thursday, 19 April 2007


The deadliest shooting in American history was carried out by Cho Seung-Hu, a young 23-year-old Creative Writing major.

This should send shivers down the spines of university and TAFE teachers in Australia. In 2002 a Monash University IT student gunned two students and injured five others at the Clayton Campus.

Those at the front line of teaching and especially those teaching in the arts, get a “gut feeling” about some students. It's not always easy to articulate but it usually manifests itself in fear and anxiety. A primal sense that something's not right.

Advertisement

The director of creative writing at Virginia Tech's English department, Professor Lucinda Roy, had Cho Seung-Hu in one of her classes and she described him as "troubled".

Two of the Cho's plays, Richard McBeef and Mr Brownstone, deal with bizarre and disturbing subject matter such as murder, pedophilia and a fragmented family life. In one particularly violent passage in Richard McBeef, a boy muses aloud about murdering his father-in-law:

"'I hate him. Must kill Dick. Must kill Dick. Dick must die … kill Dick.'"

The play ends with the boy ramming a cereal bar into his father-in-law's mouth, who responds by killing the boy.

"There was some concern about him," said Professor Carolyn Rude, Chairwoman of the English Department and as was reported by MSN online.

"Sometimes, in creative writing, people reveal things and you never know if it's creative or if they're describing things, if they're imagining things or just how real it might be. But we're all alert to not ignore things like this," Professor Rude said.

Advertisement

As a former leader of a group of creative writing and media programs at a Victorian university, only twice in nine years did I have cause for concern that a student's writing and actions warranted investigation by the authorities. For two years a student had allegedly been verbally abusing a staff member, but he always did it when they were alone.

I discussed the matter with the university solicitor and he said it was an academic management problem. I discussed it with a councillor and she said if there was violence and intimidation involved, it was a legal matter. Universities are like a federation of states. If something goes wrong the senior executive's finger of blame is pointed at the schools and the school blames the senior executive. It's a formula for disaster.

The student failed the second year of the program and we thought we'd seen the end of him. Unfortunately, even though our Dean and myself pleaded with the university authorities not to re-admit him, it was to no avail. He'd seen a psychologist who said that socialising with students and keeping to a regular routine may help his therapy.

In the third week of the first semester he attacked the staff member, threw him against a wall and continually punched him in the face. Only then were the police called and only then did we find out that he had been stalking women around Melbourne and had been making obscene phone calls to female students. He was expelled and we never saw him again.

As I was the leader of the creative writing programs, students and staff would come to me if they had personal problems. I would help where I could but I was not a psychologist. Yet I had to act on every complaint that was made. As anyone in a leadership role knows, you need to keep your wits about you regarding the nature of some of the complaints. Some were motivated by malice - by both staff and students.

One female staff member complained 14 times about a Serbian film writing student, Karl, who was a loner and who liked the Gladiator and Sparticus “sand and sandal” genre. The teacher had been reading about the genocide and rapes in Bosnia and believed she was a potential victim. The student was occasionally verbally abusive and disruptive in class but none of the other students complained. In the end the teacher refused to teach him.

What the teacher didn't know was that Karl had had a breakdown while escaping Serbia and had left his parents behind. He was living in a boarding house with the Sisters of Mercy.

When I talked to him at the boarding house he said that he was seeing a psychiatrist and that he was having nightmares about his family being killed. I moved him to another class where the teacher was more experienced and would discuss with him at length the construction of “sand and sandal” genre.

Should he have been reprimanded or expelled? Certainly not. In my experience, many creative writing teachers - unless they were also high school teachers - have no training in recognising mental illness. They take their cues from what they perceive as the student's strange or aberrant behaviour and how the other students react around him or her.

There are four times more professional writing programs in Australia than there are courses aimed at studying Australian writing. Notions of “creativity” are highly attractive to students as they offer not only avenues of self expression but an opportunity to exorcise “inner demons”.

While it's too early to tell what Cho Seung-Hui's inner demons were, there are hints. The Chicago Tribune newspaper and ABC News reported that Cho had left behind a note in his dormitory in which he railed against "rich kids". You caused me to do this," he wrote in a long note that railed against "debauchery" and "deceitful charlatans".

Apart from the fact that creative writing teachers are not trained to recognise potentially psychotic outbreaks, they also deal with material, which, by its very nature, may be highly violent, sadistic or erotic. In the majority of cases, students channel these feelings into a coherent form and recognise them as for what they are. I'd say that more than 50 per cent of the productive output of young creative writers tends to be autobiographical.

Some of the descriptions of rape and assault were so detailed and quotes from police reports appeared so verbatim, that I believed that the events in the story really happened. Whether or not the writing was good was another matter.

One of the problems that is not much discussed behind university staff doors is the fact that creative writing can, in some individuals, unleash the demons that they have fought with counselling and medication, to allay or resolve.

The cognitive behavioural therapists tell us that “re-living” the memory of an event serves to heighten the anger and or depression. So in these cases, creative writing is not therapy but a mechanism which feeds the writers fear and delusion. Add to this the fact that about one in 10 creative writing students has suffered or continues to suffer from depression or some form of mental illness.

I had no faith in the established checks and balances to ensure that a mentally ill student was properly looked after by the university authorities. I had no faith in the university solicitors that they would act for staff against a violent student. Yet these were the early warning mechanisms that should have alerted authorities at Virginia Tech. They failed me and my staff and they may have also failed the staff in America.

As with most crimes, it was not the police who stopped the shooter from claiming more lives. Law enforcement activities and a police presence are obviously important factors in deterring crime, but they do not deter all crimes and they almost never stop crimes as they're happening.  As the tragedy at Monash university showed, the task of stopping crimes during their commission inevitably falls to private citizens - to students and teachers.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy