Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Ending poverty is within our grasp

By Tim Costello - posted Thursday, 19 April 2007


It was believed that 0.3 per cent should come from private businesses and individuals and the remaining 0.7 per cent would come from governments.

Privately Australians have shown their compassion to the world by giving generously to help those communities in the greatest need. A report released earlier this year in the UK by the Charities Aid Foundation found that Australians privately were the fourth most generous nation.

But despite this obvious compassion emanating from Australians, the level of support our government gives to overseas aid compares poorly.

Advertisement

The $2.9 billion the Australian government gave to aid this past financial year is less than they would have given had they maintained the same levels of spending as when they came to power.

In 2006/07, Australia has aid budgeted at 0.3 per cent of GNI. This is an important step forward; however, it still falls well short of the internationally agreed target of 0.5 per cent of GNI by 2010.

The government has committed $2946 million towards international aid in the 2006-07 Budget, compare that with the $22,251 million budgeted for the defence department.

Imagine what would happen if we invested even part of the defence budget in aid and development instead - if we invested more into water and sanitation initiatives or into bringing anti-malarial bed nets to malaria regions and anti-retroviral medicines to the millions of HIV-positive people who will otherwise die.

Last year the US government spent around A$750 billion on defence, this is around seven times the total aid expenditure by all countries.

If just a small proportion of this money was spent on development programs it would make a huge difference. Around A$23 billion in aid is needed for water and sanitation, A$17 billion would enable us to meet the global challenge of HIV and AIDS and A$13 billion would provide basic education to all children of primary school age around the world.

Advertisement

These are very practical actions.

Eminent economist Jeffrey Sachs has argued that if the world’s richest nations increased aid to 0.5 per cent of GNI by 2010 it would halve the one billion people living on less than $US1 a day.

This is, without question, the greatest bargain in the world.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

46 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rev. Tim Costello is the Chief Eecutive of World Vision Australia. He is also a lawyer and Baptist minister and is well known in Australia for his stance on social justice issues.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim Costello

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tim Costello
Article Tools
Comment 46 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy