Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Time to limit hot air debate

By Tor Hundloe - posted Friday, 13 April 2007


And given we have overcome scarcity - our obesity rate is one index, another is our high per capita ownership of DVDs, mobile phones etc - we could investigate the relationship between GDP and genuine wellbeing and happiness.

Economists in other countries are starting to publish fascinating results on this subject. To come to the real puzzle with Howard's proposal to price carbon, the question is how do you get a market to operate if there is not a scarce commodity to sell. Until you and I face a limit to the amount of carbon dioxide we can emit each year, and have to buy permits from our mates or others who happen to emit less, there will be no price.

Of course, setting an overall limit for the country and then dividing up parcels of it to all and sundry (or simply all major carbon-intensive industries) is not a task you would contemplate in an election year.

Advertisement

What is interesting to recall is that Australia was the first country in the world to apply a "cap and trade" policy - in tuna fishery. An overall limit was set on scientific grounds and this was then divided into small lots which could be sold.

The efficient operators bought permits from the less efficient and both the environmental goal of protecting the fish stocks and the economic goal of doing it profitably were met.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Courier-Mail on April 10, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

26 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tor Hundloe is Emeritus Professor of Environmental Management at The University of Queensland.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tor Hundloe

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 26 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy