Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Avoiding a digital Dark Age

By Adrian Burton - posted Wednesday, 11 April 2007


The patient development and disciplined application of community standards is the key to ensuring the golden age of mutual intelligibility does not turn into a dark age of tribal confusion.

The promised golden age includes sophisticated public services for search, discovery, access, analysis, visualisation, fusion, submission and presentation of research. For this to work we need intelligent data; the raw data needs to be structured, described, and “marked up” with meta-information.

This applies to scholarly literature as much as to data sets, because even text files need to be structured and marked up with discipline specific meta-tags to participate in sophisticated bibliographic, data-mining and discovery services.

Advertisement

In the dark age of information, we bequeath to our sons and daughters an unending sea of ones and zeros with no standard structure, description, or provenance data. Extracting useful information from this “dumb data” will be a time-consuming process.

The golden age is predicated on openness, a willingness to grant access to scholarly outputs and research data. With the advent of the World Wide Web as a core part of popular culture, there is a new expectation that everything should be findable and accessible online. And commonly available software empowers authors and data scientists to self-publish their work.

Copyright and digital rights management are not necessarily risks to this openness. The risks lie rather with the general ignorance of the rights and responsibilities in this area or with the lack (or non-adoption) of clear protocols for expressing these rights.

Openness of research data has social barriers in some disciplines where primacy and sole use of data is important to academic reputation. Other disciplines have adopted at a community level a greater expectation of immediate open access to research data.

Advances in ICT technology are enabling the prospect of a golden age of research information. However the barbarians are massing outside the empire, and unless we invest to secure digital longevity, persistent identification, interoperability, richness of data, and open access, a regression into a digital dark age is also possible.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in Australian R&D Review on April 7, 2007. It is republished in collaboration with ScienceAlert, the only news website dedicated to Australasian science.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Adrian Burton leads the Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy