Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Poverty - our moral failure

By Tim Costello - posted Tuesday, 13 March 2007


Yet even with the 2005 announcement by Prime Minister John Howard that the government would almost double our overseas aid budget - it will only take us to 0.36 per cent of GNI.

The funding shortfall is tragic because we know increased aid can strike a blow against poverty. Eminent economist Jeffrey Sachs has argued that if the world’s richest nations took overseas aid spending to even 0.5 per cent of GNI by 2010 it would halve the one billion people who are “living” on less than $US1 a day.

In 2005 the world gave $US106.8 billion in aid when $140 billion is needed to make extreme poverty history. To put this in perspective the US has spent $180 billion a year for the last three years in Iraq.

Advertisement

Over the last year we have seen global warming shoot to the top of this nation’s political agenda. This is because it is a clear moral challenge and an issue we can and must address. Indeed we know that climate change will have disastrous implications for the world’s poorest communities.

Yet the commitment required to eradicate global poverty is modest compared to the cost we will have to endure in combating climate change. In 20 years time I suspect that we will be shocked at how modest the request of 0.7 per cent is from the poorest trying to survive and keep their children alive. In requesting 0.7 per cent they did not ask us to give up our second cars or coal fired power stations, holiday homes and consumer excesses but just show a little charity that we could easily afford.

We are making progress in the war against chronic poverty. In the late 1950s poverty killed up to 50,000 children a day - today it kills 30,000. And now this generation has the capacity and the resources to end chronic poverty in our time.

World Vision will continue to work with the Australian public to fight the causes of poverty in our world. But we will also highlight that it was not the public or aid organisations that signed up to the commitment to boost aid to 0.7 per cent. It was our government and our failure to act on this continues to be a moral failure for our nation.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

A version of this article was first published in The Age on March 8, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

30 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rev. Tim Costello is the Chief Eecutive of World Vision Australia. He is also a lawyer and Baptist minister and is well known in Australia for his stance on social justice issues.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim Costello

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tim Costello
Article Tools
Comment 30 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy