Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Hicks case is simply about a fair go

By Kelvin Thomson - posted Thursday, 22 February 2007

David Hicks' detention at Guantanamo Bay long ago ceased being about him. It is now about us. Do we still believe in habeas corpus - no imprisonment without trial -with its proud history dating back almost 800 years to Magna Carta?

Do we still believe in a fair trial, and understand that the right to be tried by a jury of your peers is part of the package? Labor believes that the rule of law should be universally applied. Anyone accused of a crime should be afforded a swift and fair trial, irrespective of the nature of the allegations or political sensitivities.

Australians regard a fair trial as the legal form of a fair go. So it is worrying that the Attorney-General says the extent of his focus for David Hicks' case is "ensuring that any process is as fair as possible".


Attorney-General, it's either fair or it's not fair.

The Attorney-General omits inconvenient truths. David Hicks is being held right now without charge, whereas two British citizens who were deemed fit to be charged have long since been returned to Britain. But the most worrying point the Attorney-General chose to evade was the US Military Commission's lack of essential guarantees of independence and impartiality.

Sections 268.31 and 268.76 of the Australian Criminal Code, by reference to international treaties that Australia has long been party to, specifically recognise the importance of independence and impartiality.

Unlike the Guantanamo trials, Australian and US civil courts exclude hearsay evidence and evidence produced by coercion. They provide the defence counsel with access to all evidence used by the prosecution and provide adequate opportunity for cross examination as well as genuine avenues for appeal.

The use of coercion techniques at Guantanamo Bay alone should concern the Attorney-General. Interrogation techniques authorised by the US secretary of defence since December 2, 2002, included treatment amounting to physical coercion. Reports last month about allegations made by 26 US FBI agents about use of illegal interrogation techniques are consistent with claims by David Hicks and his defence counsel, Major Michael Mori.

The US Government itself knows that the military commissions do not constitute a fair trial - it has banned any US citizen from being tried under them!


Having dismissed the idea of a fair go, the Attorney-General insinuates that those genuinely concerned about Hicks' lack of access to justice are either blind to terrorism or seeking to subvert the law.

Irrespective of how many teenagers the Attorney-General says, by way of forgiving comparison, were also incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay, the question is whether or not Hicks will get a fair trial and whether or not Australians are happy to have the rule of law compromised. Labor believes the rule of law should not be compromised. Deviations from the rule of law undermine the system and expose individuals to risks of physical abuse as well as injustice.

But let's be clear, the allegations against David Hicks are very serious. Labor is calling for justice, not special treatment.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Sunday Age on January 14, 2007.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

116 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kelvin Thomson is the Federal member for Wills.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kelvin Thomson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kelvin Thomson
Article Tools
Comment 116 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy