Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

It's all about oil

By Marko Beljac - posted Monday, 5 February 2007

The United States has deployed an extra aircraft carrier battle group for the Persian Gulf in order to rattle the sabre in the nuclear standoff with Iran. Given the experience with dodgy intelligence during the lead up to the invasion of Iraq it is worth reflecting on just how real is the purported Iranian nuclear threat.

The Iranian nuclear program is long standing and can be traced all the way back to the Shah who held power prior to the 1979 revolution. At the time Henry Kissinger stated, the “introduction of nuclear power will both provide for the growing needs of Iran’s economy and free remaining oil reserves for export or conversion to petrochemicals”.

Today, one of the main pillars of the argument that Iran’s nuclear energy program is actually a cover for a weapons program is the notion that oil rich Iran has no economic need for nuclear energy. Asked to explain the shift Kissinger responded that Iran under the Shah was an allied power.


The recent crisis began when US intelligence disclosed to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that Iran was building a secret uranium enrichment facility.

In other words, if Iran were an ally of the United States then the intelligence on Tehran’s uranium enrichment facility would most likely have never made it to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

If the IAEA is to solely rely on intelligence from the US then it becomes likely that the only covert nuclear programs that the IAEA refers to the UN would be ones the US doesn’t like: it would effectively become an instrument of US policy. Earlier this year the IAEA refused to condemn Israel for its own, albeit outside of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) framework, nuclear weapons.

But how seriously should we take the economic argument? A Los Alamos National Laboratory study, which is often cited in these debates, argued that Iran has no economic rationale for a civil nuclear energy program. However, the terms of reference of the report were quite limited for the report only looked at Iran’s enrichment program, not its entire array of nuclear activities.

A more comprehensive study appeared in the The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, which concluded that Iran faces a grave energy crisis because it needs to import oil-based products given that it has inadequate refining infrastructure and growing domestic demand due to demographic growth. This energy crunch threatens the regime’s long term viability, the study surmises.

It is not obvious that Iran has no economic rationale for a nuclear energy program and if it does then it does not matter who is in the presidential palace in Tehran given this structural need.


The only factors that could ameliorate this structural need would be external, but Iran has long been the subject of a US policy of containment, a key plank of which used to be support of Saddam Hussein during the period when he committed his worst atrocities. The screws have been tightened some more in recent times, especially in relation to financial sanctions and oil sector sanctions.

Iran’s response has been measured, contrary to most news comment, which characterises it as being “hardline”. Interestingly, it has also intensified a power struggle in Tehran between moderates and conservatives.

This progressive tightening of the screws, given the energy crisis that Iran faces, could easily be seen in Tehran as reflecting a policy of regime change. Similar perceptions in Pyongyang led to the recent North Korean nuclear test.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Beljac teaches at Swinburne University of Technology, is a board member of the New International Bookshop, and is involved with the Industrial Workers of the World, National Tertiary Education Union, National Union of Workers (community) and Friends of the Earth.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Marko Beljac

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Marko Beljac
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy