Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia's next health system

By Julia Gillard - posted Friday, 1 September 2006


That’s why building better partnerships with the states and territories would be the first-term focus of a Beazley Labor Government.

However a Beazley Labor Government would also look to the long-term and be prepared to examine the need for big changes. That includes being prepared to genuinely discuss the arguments for and against a single funder for health care.

Because the real question for a major reform proposal is this: would the benefits outweigh the costs?

Advertisement

Sceptics make the point that better partnerships with the states could deliver many of the same practical benefits, without the significant transition costs. They also argue that whatever the barriers to getting full benefits from the better partnership approach, those same barriers apply to implementing a single funder.

Inherent in any re-allocation of funding responsibilities is a re-allocation of revenues, which would require real commitment to reform across all players, and would have to be subject to consideration of national expenditure priorities.

There would be no-one in the country who would want remote Canberra-based departmental bureaucrats trying to run our local hospitals. That would be a recipe for disaster and for the loss of community good will and support for local services.

And given the political and constitutional authority of state governments in the Australian health system, it’s clear that a move to a single funder would require a broad consensus in support of a specific model to succeed.

The one thing you can be sure of is that anyone who has already made up their mind about exactly what governments should do in this area just hasn’t thought through all the difficult issues.

It’s a complex area of national policy which we must be prepared to examine properly. So unlike the Howard Government, Federal Labor will not rule this option out without serious consideration. I certainly have an open mind on a single funder for health care.

Advertisement

That’s the discussion for which the next Health Care Agreements must set the scene.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

Extract from the Annual Earle Page College of Politics Lecture delivered by Julia Gillard, Shadow Minister for Health at the University of New England August 22, 2006. 



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

22 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julia Gillard is Prime Minister of Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julia Gillard

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julia Gillard
Article Tools
Comment 22 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy