Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

UN reform calls for strong resolution

By Syed Atiq ul Hassan - posted Friday, 25 August 2006

In 1919, in recognition of the need to promote international co-operation and achieve peace and security after World War I, the League of Nations was established.

Although US president Woodrow Wilson was the main advocate for the League, the US, crucially, never joined.

Twenty or so years after World War 1, political crises and conflicts emerged again in Europe, but the experiences of World War I had left many American politicians with a strong desire for isolationism. This led to the introduction of the Neutrality Acts under which the US embargoed the shipment of warheads, and banned travel on ships belonging to belligerents.


In the 1930s, as the events in Europe and Asia that led to World War II unfolded, the League of Nations was found to be ineffective in preventing conflict and, in 1946, dissolved itself, and its services and mandates.

Despite the League’s failure, the international community remained ambitious for a fresh international body that could maintain international peace and security, uphold justice, and respect international treaties and laws.

In 1945, representatives from 50 countries gathered at the United Nations Conference on International Organisation in San Francisco to draw up the United Nations Charter. But even after the charter came into effect in 1945, nothing changed.

Power remained in the hands of the Big Five - China, France, the USSR, the UK and the US - but in the name of maintaining global peace and security, the UN Security Council was created.

The Big Five, which were also the nuclear states, became the Security Council’s permanent members, and kept the veto power - although the word "veto" is never actually used in the UN Charter.

Being a nuclear state was not a criterion for becoming a permanent Security Council member, but the Big Five justified their position on the grounds of their military might, and as the victorious powers of World War II.


The veto power has been highly controversial since the drafting of the UN Charter, and it’s unlikely the US and the USSR would have accepted the UN’s creation without the veto privilege.

In the “world’s largest democratic body”, a resolution on peace, security or any other international issue cannot be passed if it doesn’t suit just one of the Big Five.

Since the creation of the UN, Russia (and the former USSR) has used its veto 120 times; the US, 76; Britain, 32; France, 18; and China only five.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

Article edited by Allan Sharp.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syed Atiq ul Hassan, is senior journalist, writer, media analyst and foreign correspondent for foreign media agencies in Australia. His email is

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syed Atiq ul Hassan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy