Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

US soft drinks lose their fizz in India

By Elizabeth Mills - posted Thursday, 24 August 2006


This marks significant progress considering that soft carbonated drinks amount to a minor part of most Indian's daily diet. Local papers have wasted no time in raking up evidence pointing to the high levels of pesticide residue present in milk and bread, higher still than those found in the carbonated drinks.

This prompted the rather dramatic soundbite from the CSE that “milk and vegetables also have nutrition. They give us something in the poison-nutrition trade-off.”

This does not alter the fact that pesticide residue levels really shouldn't be this high in the first place and wouldn't be if India wasn't so heavy in its use of pesticides.

Advertisement

The emphasis that the debate has placed on Coca-Cola, Pepsico, and whether or not their drinks contain acceptable levels of pesticide residue, is masking a much bigger issue. What the debate needs to provoke is government action on food safety.

The government should shoulder the responsibility for a lack of standards and regulation. It needs to show greater public accountability and tighten legislation. In some respects, it is surprising that this issue hasn't emerged sooner. Events like the 1984 Union Carbide disaster in Bhopal - in which a toxic gas leak from the plant claimed the lives of several thousand people - have increased public awareness of the impact of environmental issues on health. The government has subsequently come under pressure over issues like GM crops, so why not food and drink standards?

In a country where there is no choice to “go organic”, and even if there was, it would be prohibitively expensive for most, the government should be looking at the issue throughout the food and drink production chain from better regulating the use of pesticides to implementing quality and safety standards before the point of consumption.

In many respects, if such standards had been in use in the first place, this controversy and the subsequent investment fears, arguably wouldn’t have happened. When in opposition in 2003, the Congress Party took issue with the government on the CSE’s findings and the need for better standards. Now that Congress is in power at the federal level, it is time to see if this proves to be political rhetoric or whether the party will make good on its earlier stance.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Elizabeth Mills is an analyst covering South Asian issues for macro-economic forecaster, Global Insight.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Elizabeth Mills

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy