Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Kischmania!

By Peter Vallee - posted Wednesday, 13 September 2006


To take one example, Kisch says this of the fall of the Bruce Government in 1929: “the conservative Prime Minister, S.M. Bruce … foresaw its [the Great Depression’s] arrival earlier than the above-mentioned Socialists. He abdicated and made way for a Labour Cabinet, allowing it to take over the responsibility”. With this simple canard, Kisch (or his collaborator John Fisher who is thought to have ghost-written most of the commentary on Australia) reproduces for his European readership the slander of both major Australian political parties.

The Kisch account of Australia is, in effect, the view from the Stalinist left of Australian politics, dressed up as reporting.

In other words, Kisch wrote propaganda. It was not the stodgy Socialist Realism required of writers in the Soviet Union, and all the better as propaganda for it. The East German Government made of Kisch posthumously the model of a communist journalist. (In West Germany, too, the founder of Stern magazine established in his honour an award for journalism.)

Advertisement

Kisch, and his later admirers, labelled his form of propaganda “reportage”. Reportage, pronounced as in French and used in its continental sense, was characterised partly by its subject-matter - the people and events that were not, by the standards of 19th century journalism, the source of news.

Ordinary, non-office-holding people and their lives, but especially those people whose lives were extraordinary in ways that newspaper-readers do not wish to share: foreigners, criminals, prostitutes, the destitute.

Other defining characteristics of “reportage” include discarding the reporter’s usual detachment in favour of identifying with his subjects. More dangerously, reportage fills in the gaps left by reporting, using the techniques of fiction writing to construct the subjects’ subjectivity when they don’t report it themselves, and constructing stories where the observed events failed to provide such a satisfying form. Making stuff up, in other words.

And if all that fails, the writer can be himself or herself a player in the action, where there is some action to play a part in. Travel writing provides many occasions for the writer’s participation. On top of this intriguing mix could be added a kind of overt commentary that drew conviction from the artful story-telling on which it was built.

Kisch was, as practitioners of reportage tend to be, both a deliberate and a surreptitious propagandist. Perhaps judging more by his assessment of the Comintern than from intimate knowledge of Kisch’s writing, Professor Stuart McIntyre concludes that “Kisch and his circle of publicists who worked for the Communist International … By the 1930s … were required to follow every twist and turn of Stalin’s strategy of building a united front against fascism that would answer to his instructions and serve his own needs”.

In 1923 Kisch asserted proudly his role as propagandist for Communism although he denied it two years later in the introduction to his first popular book, The rampaging reporter. I have seen no evidence that Kisch ever informed his more naïve readership of his party membership. It is reasonable to come to the simple conclusion that deception was essential to Kisch’s role as a propagandist for the Soviet state. He knew that to lie effectively one had to pretend to tell the truth.

Advertisement

According to one who has read them, his commentary on other countries is as reliable as his account of Australia. As McIntyre also records in his history of the Australian Communist Party, Kisch made facts in the service of propaganda a popular literary style among Australian Communist writers of the 1930s. Among those regarded as his followers were Rupert Lockwood and Wilfred Burchett.

On the face of it, it is hard to see what there is in Kisch’s story for 21st century Australian intellectuals to like, but like it they do.

As I wrote this piece the ABC was in the process of devoting two hours of its air-time to readings from Kisch’s writings (using a reader whose heavy Slavic accent Kisch would surely have detested) and reflections on his Australian imitators. Just this year Radio National’s history unit has given Kisch two hours, as has the documentaries unit. Go back a few years and he bounces up on Breakfast (twice), Perspective (as an op-ed by author Heidi Zogbaum), Late Night Live (of course), Books and Writing, the Media Report, The Europeans, Encounter (religion - Kisch’s family were Jewish) and Lingua Franca (twice). The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age both based articles on the publication of the short book on Kisch in Australia by Heidi Zogbaum.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Vallee is a retired private sector manager who lives in Canberra. He has completed a study of Aboriginal people, pastoralists, police and missionaries in Central Australia during the 1880s, what they did with and to each other, and why. His book God, guns and government on the Central Australian frontier is available from all booksellers who'll take the trouble to ask the distributor and a few booksellers who already have.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Vallee

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy