Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The beginning of the end?

By Taimor Hazou - posted Monday, 21 August 2006


Deterrence works by creating fear.

And veteran Israeli Arab affairs specialist Zvi Bar'el says Israel's military deterrence is no longer working. “Why, after more than 150 have been killed in three weeks, do the Palestinians continue firing Qassams, mortar shells, whatever? Why is it that the logic of the Israeli Defence Force, which measures its forces by the amount of steel it possesses, does not work on them?” he asks. And the answer, he says, is the same as in Lebanon: “when war is waged without discrimination, deterrence is meaningless.” The Arabs have lost their fear, and they can no longer be bombed into submission, a new reality the Americans face every day in Iraq.

Much of Lebanon is destroyed, more than 900 Lebanese have been killed and 3,200 wounded - one third of the casualties had been children under 12 - and one million people, a quarter of the population, displaced. There have been significant civilian deaths in Israel, too. This is a catastrophe.

Advertisement

Yet it fits a pattern of action by Israel, supported by the United States, that will eventually lead to disaster for both.

Last week, Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security advisor to US President Jimmy Carter, told New Perspectives Quarterly, “These neocon prescriptions, of which Israel has its equivalents, are fatal for America and ultimately for Israel. They will totally turn the overwhelming majority of the Middle East's population against the United States. The lessons of Iraq speak for themselves. Eventually, if neo-con policies continue to be pursued, the United States will be expelled from the region and that will be the beginning of the end for Israel as well.”

From Israel's leading defence correspondent Ze'ev Schiff to former Australian prime minister, Malcolm Fraser, the informed view is that Israel has lost the military battle and international support, strengthened Lebanese resolve and handed Hezbollah a recruiting bonanza.

Fraser says, “Israel is building hatred. It is guaranteeing that if Hezbollah wants volunteers, it will obtain them in their tens of thousands ... The Israeli tactics cannot work and there is indeed in this sense a similarity with the Vietnam War of decades ago ... Israel then has been living, I believe, in a fantasy land. The military campaign is not working and its political demands are not achievable.”

Former deputy prime minister Tim Fisher says, “this war is going to embed the hatred for the next 20 years”.

Israel has brutally denied Palestinian rights to statehood in a policy of escalating repression that leaves it increasing bereft of friends. In the late 1970s, it funded and supported Islamic charities, the precursors of Hamas, as a “moderate” alternative to the PLO.

Advertisement

Its 1982 invasion of Lebanon signalled the beginning of the end of Israel's moral hegemony in the West, and the emergence of Hezbollah as a direct result of Israel's war and occupation of south Lebanon. The expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon to Tunisia brought the focus of Palestinian resistance to the 1967-occupied territories, which Israel has brutally engineered into Bantustans reminiscent of South Africa's apartheid era.

The current mayhem is a product of the immunity the United States has granted Israel from UN conventions and resolutions. Harsh rule has gone unpunished and become standard practice. Palestinians have been humiliated and harassed, detained and killed in their thousands, but they are not deterred.

The United States has stumbled from disaster to disaster.

In 1979 the Islamic revolution overthrew the quisling regime of the Shah in Iran. Shortly after, US president Ronald Reagan fatefully decided to throw billions of dollars in arms and support at the Afghani mujahaddin fighting the Soviet-backed government in Kabul. Hello and welcome, Osama.

Ironically Brzezinski, when asked in 1988 whether he regretted having supported the Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan and given arms and advice to future terrorists, replied: “What is more important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims of the liberation of central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”

As the mujahaddin won in Afghanistan and the Taliban came to power with the backing of Pakistani intelligence (which was the main conduit for American money into Afghanistan), the United States supported the export of Islamist militias from Afghanistan to Bosnia and Chechnya. All the ingredients for a foreign policy disaster.

And to complete the recipe, add in the continuing failure to resolve the Palestinian issue, the completely bungled response to 9-11 and the deepening mire in Afghanistan, the descent into hell in Iraq since 2003, and now Lebanon today. Could the United States have done a better job of preparing the day, in Brzezinski's words, when it will be expelled from the region, signalling the beginning of the end for Israel as well?

There is, of course, another way. The complex issues that drive the region back to war must be resolved as a whole. The Palestinian issue has a particularly iconic status in the Arab and Muslim worlds: it is the hub from which the many spokes of discontent run. Peace solutions that do not address the underlying Palestinian issue will necessarily fail and drive a renewed cycle of violence; the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel will ameliorate the growing sense of grievance that growing numbers of Arabs and Muslims are expressing.

Says Brzezinski: “The new element today is that it is becoming increasingly difficult to separate the Israeli-Palestinian problem, the Iraq problem and Iran from each other. Neither the United States nor Israel has the capacity to impose a unilateral solution in the Middle East. There may be people who deceive themselves into believing that. The solution can only come in the Israel-Palestinian issue if there is serious international involvement that supports the moderates from both sides.”

We can ponder the alternative with growing fear.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

62 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Taimor Hazou is a fellow of OzProspect, a non-partisan public policy think tank, and Deputy Chair of the Australian Arabic Council. Taimor Hazou’s X360 avatar is ZenTym; he is an avid gamer, social commentator, Melbourne writer and parent of two gamers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Taimor Hazou

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 62 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy