Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Handcuffed by our Western values?

By John E. Carey - posted Friday, 18 August 2006


We need to think very carefully about what this means for the United States and the Western World and where we go from here.

The terrorists are: using liquid explosives carried aboard in hand luggage in their planning to destroy hundreds of passengers in airliners - this since 1995, and it continues; using aircraft as weapons (9-11) and bombing trains and buses (Britain’s 7-7 and Madrid); and using Katyusha rockets to bombard Haifa and other targets in Israel. These unguided rockets are intentionally and indiscriminately killing innocent civilians. About 4,000 of these have been used to date, with 250 fired into Israel on Sunday within 24 hours of a UN “cease fire”.

To put this in a nutshell, Israel, used a conventional military force bound by restrictions on the indiscriminate killing of civilians, to find and kill people lobbing unguided rockets into their civilian population with no restrictions on their use of indiscriminate killing: a kind of asymmetric warfare of the most heinous sort.

Advertisement

The UN and the media view the opposing forces through one single prism of values: both are brother nations of the world. In fact, there seems to be a media bias towards Hezbollah (not a nation at all). And Kofi Annan wasted no time in saying Israel “intentionally” killed UN observers during the conflict.

The terrorists, media and the UN tend to handcuff the West within its own values even more, while the other side feels empowered. Reuters news service participated in the chicanery last week by publishing doctored photos detrimental to Israel.

And the screaming rhetoric of Aljazeera reminds us that the other side doesn’t play by the same rules as the west - freedom of the press without checks and balances.

In a story in the Los Angeles Times by Ashraf Khalil on August 1, Khalil detailed how the Israelis are also phoning innocent civilians on the civilians’ mobile phones to warn them of impending danger due to military action. Israel also used a radio station to warn civilians in Lebanon of impending danger: in Arabic. Israel dropped leaflets to warn civilians.

Israel moved humanitarian care and caution in war to a new level.

No nation, in the history of man, ever went to such great lengths in war to warn innocent civilians. And this in the face of an enemy, Hezbollah, who elected to hide behind those very civilians.

Advertisement

On August 10, former Israeli Prime Minister Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu told reporters that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad is working on nuclear weapons and “eventually after crying wolf, you face the wolf, and this wolf has nuclear teeth, and it will bite, of that I’m sure”.

This is the same President Ahmadinejad that appeared on 60 Minutes on August 13, claiming that the UN was only serving US needs; who said last autumn that the Jewish state had to be wiped off the face of the earth; and who is defying the United Nations while he does nuclear research that most experts believe is intended to make a nuclear bomb. This is the same President Ahmadinejad that is arming Hezbollah and developing his own long range ballistic missiles.

A few days ago, Mr Bernard Lewis, professor emeritus at Princeton, wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “During the Cold War, both sides possessed weapons of mass destruction, but neither side used them, deterred by what was known as MAD, mutual assured destruction. Similar constraints have no doubt prevented their use in the confrontation between India and Pakistan.”

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Adapted by the author from an article first published in The Washington Times on August 16, 2006



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

68 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John E. Carey has been a military analyst for 30 years.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John E. Carey

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 68 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy