Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Water more expensive than oil?

By Frank Rijsberman - posted Wednesday, 16 August 2006

Water has been referred to as the blue gold, and only recently (when oil cost US$10 dollars a barrel) some scientists predicted that water would soon become more expensive than oil. People do already pay as much as $US5-10 dollars for a cubic metre of tap water in some countries in Europe (including treatment of waste) and up to several hundred US dollars for a cubic metre of bottled mineral water. As we are bombarded with stories in the media on water scarcity and drought, should we be worried that the price of water will spike to US$80 dollars per cubic metre, as has happened for oil?

While no doubt people in some drought-striken towns in Australia will find it hard to believe, even severely water scarce countries have something like 500-1,000 cubic metres of water for each inhabitant a year. People need at least some 20 cubic metres a year for their domestic needs (50 litres a day) - a tiny fraction of the water available even in very water scarce countries. We will not run out of bottled mineral water any time soon.

Depending on diet, however, as much as 70 times more water, 1,400 cubic metres a year, is needed to grow food. Water-scarce countries need to import the food they do not have the water to grow. That is what Egypt does: it imports more than half of its food because there is no water to grow it domestically. It imports food from countries like the US, Argentina, Brazil and Australia - where large amounts of water are converted into food and exported.


Irrigation engineers used to think their goal was to capture water, in reservoirs, before it would flow to the sea and be “wasted”. So many dams have been built that many rivers indeed barely reach the sea anymore. People around the world discovered, however, that all rainwater serves a purpose in nature. Every drop taken is a trade-off.

As long as the value of water in nature is not recognised, and water for agriculture is subsidised, the chances are too many dams will be built. Farmers generally pay no more than cents for each cubic metre of water, if they pay at all. The really tough water decisions are to balance water for agriculture with water for nature.

In Australia the response has been to cap the use of water in the Murray-Darling, make water trade-able, and start buying back water from agriculture to return it to nature. Many other countries are just coming to terms with the fact free water has run out. Water is available, but at a price. If farmers don’t pay the price, then nature will.

We cannot escape the fact as water scarcity increases, the price of water is bound to go up. People will pay, if they have to, up to the value they get out of the use. That is why cities and industry, where the value they get out of the water use is measured at least in dollars per cubic metre, out-compete agriculture easily almost everywhere. The value or productivity of water in agriculture varies from several cents for most grain crops up to as much as $1 for intensive vegetable production.

Good government policy will help water move from lower to higher value uses. As water gets scarcer, it no longer makes sense for society to use it to grow crops with a water productivity of only cents for each cubic metre, if the value in nature is more. Of course, as long as the price farmers pay for water is less than what they get out of it, they will keep using it.

Research can help determine the value of water in alternative uses, even for complex uses such as nature. Agricultural research also works to increase the productivity of water in agriculture. A combination of smart engineering and agronomy, for example, can drive the water needed to produce a kilogram of rice down from 2,000 to as little as 500 litres.


Recent advances in molecular biology have increased the potential to develop drought resistant crops. To keep agriculture competitive and sustainable, a 50 per cent increase in the productivity of water in agriculture will be feasible - and necessary - worldwide, over the next two decades. Increasing the value people get out of water will help them prepare for price increases.

While I think only designer water like Perrier will remain more expensive than oil at current prices, I would not be surprised to see the price of water double or triple over the next two decades.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Dr Rijsberman is addressing the international development conference “Water for Irrigated Agriculture and the Environment: Finding a Flow for All” at Parliament House, Canberra today, August 16, 2006.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Frank Rijsberman has been Director General of the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), since 2000. He is also a professor at the UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education in Delft and at Wageningen University and Research in the Netherlands. Rijsberman earned his PhD in water resources planning and management from Colorado State University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Frank Rijsberman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Frank Rijsberman
Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy