Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

'Failed State': a destructive label

By Harry Throssell - posted Monday, 25 September 2006


The tragic paradox is that wealthy countries spend large amounts on peace-keeping when those funds could more constructively be used to bolster a poor country’s economy. Ending the violence is essential but it only stops the symptoms. One of the tragedies of the modern world is to see people starving for lack of food but owning weapons and ammunition.

Politicians like to speak of armies as peacekeepers but they are mainly trained to destroy. In the final hours of the recent Hezbollah-Israel war cluster bombs were used to scatter unexploded bomblets, which lie dormant until touched, often by children who can lose a leg or a life.

The statements by Howard and Nelson on the need for more troops in the armed services did not mention the fact they might be called on to kill others, may get killed or maimed themselves, and risk permanent or long-term psychological damage, including the dreaded post traumatic stress disorder which can last a lifetime. Is it fair to omit these realities?

Advertisement

Armies may be needed to end conflict. But this seems to be putting the cart before the horse. Armies are very expensive. Is there not some way the extra $10 billion for new Australian battalions can be used to forestall violence by eradicating the poverty that causes it?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Harry Throssell originally trained in social work in UK, taught at the University of Queensland for a decade in the 1960s and 70s, and since then has worked as a journalist. His blog Journospeak, can be found here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Harry Throssell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy