Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Legal abuse of animals

By Katrina Sharman - posted Wednesday, 21 June 2006

Three quarters of the world’s 4,700 million egg laying hens are confined in battery cages. Most of these birds barely have room to flap their wings and never live to feel the earth under their feet.

Across the shopping aisle, their cousins, 44 billion “broiler” chickens (each year) live a short but miserable life, reared for meat in dimly lit sheds and fed a diet including antibiotics, before being transformed into food such as drumsticks, burgers and nuggets.

It is now more than three decades since Peter Singer kick-started the modern animal rights movement with his ground-breaking work Animal Liberation. With the release of his latest book, The ethics of what we eat (co-authored with Jim Mason), it seems like an appropriate time for reflection.


Are animals actually doing any better?

At first glance, it would appear not. After all, the intensive “factory farming” of animals has become a global phenomenon, with the “Old MacDonald” style of farm fast disappearing from the rural landscape.

A report released last year by the world’s largest network of animal protection societies (World Society for the Protection of Animals) reveals that approximately 2.5 billion pigs around the world are raised in factory farms each year, where they spend most of their time crammed into sheds. Many females spend part of their lives in “sow crates”, in which they can barely take a step forward or backwards for some of their reproductive cycle. Their piglets fair little better, with most only seeing the sunshine for the first time on their way to the abattoir. These sensitive, intelligent animals, who are at least as smart as our family dogs, also apparently share cognitive skills with primates.

This all sounds like a terrible nightmare. It demonstrates a clear and continued violation of the right to bodily integrity and bodily liberty and would surely be actionable were animals not classified in law as mere property. And if you think that it couldn’t happen in a beautiful, natural landscape like Australia, it does.

The good news for animals is that knowledge about the extent and magnitude of animal suffering is spreading and the animal protection movement is growing in size, legitimacy and sophistication as a result. In the same way that the environmental movement was once seen as fringe, discussion about animal rights and the basic right not to suffer is fast moving into the mainstream.

Community education about the lives of animals has a crucial role to play in this movement because the bulk of animal suffering is hidden from the public eye. As consumers, we only ever see the “end product” of animal use, be it meat, clothes, cosmetics or pharmaceuticals. We also have a limited but rapidly growing understanding of the complexity of other animals’ lives.


For example, while it was once thought that the use of tools was the exclusive domain of humans, we now know chimpanzees and magpies use tools, great apes and whales have complex communication abilities and pigs can experience apathy, stress and chronic depression when their behavioural needs are not met.

Arguably, the suffering of animals alone should be sufficient grounds for providing them with a better life, however as individuals, we are all persuaded by different ideas. Whichever road we decide to take, the news is promising. Globally, evidence is growing to suggest that communities are rediscovering respect for animals and are expressing opinions and preferences, both in public forums and at the checkout.

Recently Wellington hosted New Zealand’s national animal rights conference. The fact the guest list included a number of lawyers and politicians is perhaps indicative of the most profound change for animals on this side of the South Pacific to occur in recent years, namely, the emergence of the animal rights law movement.

Following a North American lead, organisations like the Animal Rights Legal Advocacy Network (ARLAN) in New Zealand and Voiceless in Australia are spearheading debate and discussion amongst the legal community about the many barriers to justice that confront animals. And while most lawyers would never condone extremist animal rights activities which are unlawful or violent, it is important to recall that we all have a duty to question our laws. It was Martin Luther King Jr who cautioned us to “never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal”.

Although the obstacles to greater protection for animals are significant, they are not insurmountable if we are willing to open our hearts and minds to this important social justice movement.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Article edited by Melanie Olding.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This is an edited version of an article first published in The Dominion Post, New Zealand on June 2, 2006.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

80 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Katrina Sharman is the Corporate Counsel for Voiceless, a non-profit organisation for animals in Australia. Voiceless is an animal protection think-tank established by Brian Sherman AM and Ondine Sherman.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Katrina Sharman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 80 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy