Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Privatising the Sunshine State

By Des Moore - posted Friday, 26 May 2006

On February 10, something almost unprecedented happened in Canberra. At the Council of Australian Governments all the state Labor premiers (and their territory colleagues) agreed with the Liberal prime minister on a national economic reform agenda designed to improve health and education outcomes, increase competition in the energy, transport and ports markets, and reduce the regulatory burden on businesses.

So, with reform supposedly in the air at all levels of government, and the emphasis on increasing competition, what are the implications for state governments - and particularly the Queensland Government, which is the subject of a report I have prepared on the role of government in that state.

Maximising the private sector’s role in providing services that have traditionally been regarded as the responsibility of governments is in the Queensland Government’s own interests - even if it means a smaller government sector.


Providing services through a competitive framework will benefit the consumers - that is, most Queenslanders. Whether assessed in terms of economic prosperity or social well-being, such a framework provides a more efficient and higher quality way of delivering essential services wherever that is practicable.

And because an increased private sector role offers potential for lower taxes and better services, it is difficult to see that any government implementing a pro-private sector role would fail electorally.

A deliberative policy of increasing the competitive environment for service provision can be implemented in two ways: first, by acting directly to improve the performance of services retained within government and second, by taking steps to encourage a major increase in the proportion of such services provided by enterprises outside the government sector.

The direct approach can be implemented by giving effect to the 1996 Queensland Commission of Audit purchaser-provider recommendation that the government:

... strongly separate its role as a demanding purchaser of services … from the role of service provider; that it fund providers only against service outputs or results; and that it ensure that providers face competitive pressures to improve performance continuously.

In short, while the government would retain full responsibility for funding, the actual delivery of major services by the state would be opened to competition from the private sector.


Queensland could implement the purchaser-provider approach over a period, proceeding initially on a step-by-step basis. For example, hospitals policy could start by giving public hospitals greater autonomy and the right (and financial incentive) to contract out discrete services such as pathology and certain types of surgery.

Victoria has already built a major new public hospital under a purchase-provider arrangement, and the government is reportedly moving to implement a similar arrangement to redevelop another major public hospital.

The New South Wales Government also has had a private sector firm finance, design and construct nine schools. According to a NSW Treasury analysis, these schools were built for much less, and two years earlier, than would have been possible under a traditional public sector contract. The contractor has also effectively taken over the administration of the schools for 30 years.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

Article edited by Allan Sharp.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This is an edited version of a speech given to the Commerce Queensland Function on May 4, 2006. Read the full speech

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

18 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Des Moore is Director, Institute for Private Enterprise and a former Deputy Secretary, Treasury. He authored Schooling Victorians, 1992, Institute of Public Affairs as part of the Project Victoria series which contributed to the educational and other reforms instituted by the Kennett Government. The views are his own.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Des Moore

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Des Moore
Article Tools
Comment 18 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy