Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Innovation rules

By Thomas Barlow - posted Thursday, 18 May 2006


It is no coincidence, for example, that more than 60 per cent of Australian automotive R&D is now spent by specialised component producers designing niche products such as braking systems, fuel tanks, safety systems and steering systems rather than by mainstream car manufacturers.

While there are many implications of these two trends, two points stand out.

First, the shifting nature of innovation suggests that we should stop worrying about our ability to compete in high-tech manufacturing. The old differentiation between low-tech commodities, such as coal, wool, and iron-ore, and high-tech manufactured goods, like automobiles, computers, and mobile phones, is no longer straightforward.

Advertisement

Indeed the role that manufacturing plays in all societies is changing rapidly. Twenty-five years ago, manufactured goods made up only 25 per cent of exports from developing countries - today they constitute 80 per cent. It is time to abandon our old insecurities about Australia’s industrial structure.

Second, and this is especially pertinent to the Australian research community, I believe we should stop concerning ourselves with building scale around Australian innovations.

Size has become something of an end in itself in the Australian research sector - hence the obsession in recent years with “critical mass” and with “priority setting”. Yet in some respects, size is less important now than it has ever been.

One consequence of the open innovation model is that Australian researchers are experiencing growing opportunities to compete globally without possessing massive scale themselves. Indeed, they are now most likely to find comparative advantage simply by joining forces with, or offering niche products to, organisations that already possess the global scale for themselves.

Australian researchers, moreover, will never really be able to compete on size, only ever on the quality of their ideas - and the two are not always correlated.

In the coming century, the most important aspects of national identity will be those which relate to the ability to have ideas, to seize opportunities, to connect with technology, and to do things in new ways. The opportunities are certainly there for Australia. The big question is whether we’ll seize them or whether we will chain ourselves down with a set of beliefs that are no longer relevant.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in Science Alert.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Thomas Barlow is a technology and research strategy consultant and a former advisor to the Australian Government. His book about Australian ideas and identity, The Australian Miracle, was published by Picador in April 2006.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Thomas Barlow
Related Links
Book review: 'The Australian Miracle: An Innovative Nation Revisited' - On Line Opinion

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Thomas Barlow
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy