Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Backdown invites more demands

By Tony Kevin - posted Wednesday, 19 April 2006

There are profound ironies in the evolution of Australian policy on asylum-seekers. We have moved from John Howard's heady nationalism of 2001 to abject appeasement of the Indonesian Government.

As a former career diplomat for 30 years, I have in the past drawn attention to the need to respect Indonesian national sovereignty and the sensitivities that properly go with it. (During the bitter standoff between the Howard and Wahid governments in late 2000, for instance, I even called on our leaders to apologise to Jakarta for Australia's diplomatic blunders in the lead-up to East Timor's independence in 1999.)

Yet, having said this, I am convinced the Government's policies in respect of Papuan asylum-seekers arriving in Australia by boat are not only unethical and internationally illegal, but also dangerous from an Australian national security viewpoint.


Last Thursday, the Government announced that boat people would be mandatorily removed to offshore processing centres in Nauru, Manus or Christmas Island and that, even for those who are judged to be genuine refugees under the UN Convention, they will all or mostly never be accepted to live in Australia.

But these policies send a wrong message not only to a fairly benign Indonesian Government but also to darker, extreme nationalist elements. The message is that an Australian government can be threatened - indeed blackmailed - into abandoning essential values and interests.

In recent weeks, Indonesian ministers have perceived and exploited Australian policy irresolution. The Immigration Department's decision to award only temporary rather than permanent protection visas led Indonesia's Foreign Minister Hassan Wirayuda to warn on March 24 that Indonesia had worked closely with Australia on issues of illegal immigrants in the past three years. Those problems, he implied, could return.

Within days, Defence Minister Brendan Nelson was offering possible joint patrols with the Indonesian Navy to intercept boatpeople south of Papua. Stepping up Australian surveillance in these waters begged the question of what to do with intercepted Papuans. On April 3, Indonesian President Yudhoyono emphasised Wirayuda's warning, saying "Indonesia would review co-operation with Australia aimed at curbing people smugglers who use Indonesia as a stopover point to Australia's north".

Last Thursday Howard caved in, announcing a clearly punitive policy of deterrence. Any boatpeople claiming refugee status would be sent to offshore processing (read detention) centres and in all probability would never be allowed to settle in Australia.

Howard may have hoped this would satisfy the Indonesians. Their main concern - to avoid build-up in Australia of a politically active Papuan refugee community, as had happened with the East Timorese - might appear to have been met. But the policy won't work. Yesterday, despite Canberra's attempts to placate Jakarta, Yudhoyono complained that Australia still showed insufficient respect for Indonesia's territorial integrity and that our Government should never have issued temporary protection visas to the Papuans.


The moral of the story: appeasement only generates further demands. Instead, Canberra should tell Jakarta: "You have a problem in Papua because you are not sufficiently respecting the rights of the people there to civil liberties and a fair share of their natural resources. Until you redress these wrongs, you will continue to have insurgency and refugee problems. If refugees seek protection here, we have no alternative but to consider their claims fairly and without political interference."

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

First published in The Australian on April 18, 2006.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

47 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tony Kevin holds degrees in civil engineering, and in economics and political science. He retired from the Australian foreign service in 1998, after a 30-year career during which he served in the Foreign Affairs and Prime Minister’s departments, and was Australia’s ambassador to Poland and Cambodia. He is currently an honorary visiting fellow at the Australian National University’s Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies in Canberra. He has written extensively on Australian foreign, national security, and refugee policies in Australia’s national print media, and is the author of the award-winning books A Certain Maritime Incident – the Sinking of SIEV X, and Walking the Camino: a modern pilgrimage to Santiago. His third book on the global climate crisis, Crunch Time: Using and abusing Keynes to fight the twin crises of our era was published by Scribe in September 2009.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tony Kevin

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tony Kevin
Article Tools
Comment 47 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy