Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Focus on smoking gun obscures collective fault

By Richard Mulgan - posted Thursday, 13 April 2006


If that were the policy, it succeeded for many years, with much profit to AWB and Australian wheat farmers. DFAT officials, far from being incompetent, carried out government policy with consummate professionalism.

That AWB and the government were eventually unmasked was due to unexpected factors: the tenacity of the UN's Volcker inquiry and the limitations of the Australian Government's credit in Washington, especially in agricultural trade matters.

A policy of deliberate negligence was a high-risk strategy that dare not speak its name. But, so far, no minister has had to articulate what government policy was or to admit where it had gone wrong and why.

Advertisement

All interest has switched to the smoking gun. The assumption seems to be that if no smoking gun is discovered, and therefore no individual is found to have been personally at fault, nothing has gone wrong.

But even if it is unclear who pulled the trigger, the fact of the murder is undeniable. Ministers must admit that the policy (whichever version they choose to own up to) failed.

The collective failure, and the consequent damage to Australia's international reputation, is the elephant being overlooked in the AWB kickbacks affair.

Why are the relevant ministers, including Prime Minister John Howard, not being pressed on what the government as a whole was trying to achieve in its supervision of the AWB contracts in Iraq?

Concentrating on personal fault provides a diversion from the core function of ministerial responsibility: making ministers take collective responsibility for government policy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on April 12, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Mulgan is author of Holding Power to Account (Palgrave Macmillan 2003) and a former professor in the Crawford School of Economics and Government at the ANU.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Mulgan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Richard Mulgan
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy