Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Blog or be damned?

By James McConvill - posted Friday, 24 March 2006


The added beauty of blogging is that academics are not burdened by having to pad their contribution with references to articles and books written by others - who says they have a more enlightened opinion anyway?

In return for this sharp, snappy, relevant writing, which blogging demands and facilitates, the reward is that many more people are likely to read what academics have to say. Many academic blogs in the US attract over 20,000 readers day. At a time when universities are moving towards research quality frameworks and impact ratings, this has to be a good thing.

It is said that the average law review article in Australia is read from start to finish by three people. That’s right, months of intense scholarship is devoted to enriching the minds of three people - these inevitably being academics, students and the occasional practitioner.

Advertisement

So government funding is being pumped in to a system which is based on an “interpretive community” of academics competing for the article with the largest number of footnotes and most sophisticated use of prose. Why not reallocate that funding towards academics prepared to reach out to the world through effective blogging?

If Australian academics really are serious about being progressive, relevant and dynamic, how can blogging be resisted any longer?

As another US law professor, Geoff Manne, blogged recently: “The real question is why we are still encouraged to spend so much time flogging the cadaver of traditional scholarship.”

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

30 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

James McConvill is a Melbourne lawyer. The opinions expressed are his personal views only, and were written in the
spirit of academic freedom when James was employed as a university lecturer.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by James McConvill

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of James McConvill
Article Tools
Comment 30 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy