Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Health care: good, better, but for goodness sake give up on ‘the best’!

By Gavin Mooney - posted Tuesday, 14 March 2006


In Australia these questions need to be addressed but at the moment are not. There is no serious effort made in this country to debate and set priorities. Yet this is very necessary if we are to build a sensible, sustainable, rational, “better” health service.

Priority setting is not difficult. It involves looking at the economist’s notion of opportunity cost - the benefit foregone in the best alternative use of the resources. If spending more in program A results in greater benefit than in B, then spend it in A. If taking money out of B and spending it in A means overall greater benefit, then do so.

In Aboriginal health for example we can say that what is needed to be equitable in Aboriginal primary health care is to spend about four times what we currently spend. To do this we could halve the 30 per cent rebate the federal government introduced for private health insurance. We then need to debate which is the better buy. Again if the rest of us forewent 1 per cent of the spending on our health care, we could increase the spending on Aboriginal health care by 50 per cent.

Advertisement

Which is the better buy is what priority setting is all about, but currently such questions do not get asked. I can’t answer these questions. It is not my role to do so. I think the only people who legitimately can are informed Australian punters.

In one of the citizens’ juries I facilitated, in the wake of their desires for more funding for Aboriginal health, greater equity, mental health and prevention, when asked where the money was to come from, their answer was clear: from small inefficient hospitals and Emergency Departments. The people are not stupid and they can deal with priority setting. Yet, Paul Skerritt, the President of the WA AMA has argued leaving such matters in the hands of the public is not the way to “make big decisions”. Oh yeah?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gavin Mooney is a health economist and Honorary Professor at the Universities of Sydney and Cape Town. He is also the Co-convenor of the WA Social Justice Network . See www.gavinmooney.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gavin Mooney

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Gavin Mooney
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy