Bound by rules

This risk exists whenever governments consider intervening in our lives. The problem with bans and regulations is that individuals lose out.

Another recent example is the farce of light beer being served at the cricket. Officials are open about the fact that this is to curb antisocial behaviour. So law-abiding citizens are denied the simple pleasure of having a proper beer at the cricket because of the antisocial behaviour of a few.

A few years ago a friend of mine went to a football match at Old Trafford in the UK and was happy to be able to buy a full-strength beer - in a glass. Despite all the regulators' concerns, he enjoyed his beer, watched the game, returned the glass and went home without throwing a chair, turning into a racist or mugging someone.

Forcing grown adults to drink light beer out of a plastic cup on the grounds that they cannot be trusted to behave is further evidence of patronising behaviour from those on high.

There is even a hint of condoning irresponsibility and illegality - just as a parent might dress a child in old clothes which can get dirty. At the cricket the line seems to be "you can drink up and even throw your beer now because it's light and in a plastic cup".

In a free society those with authority should know their place.

They are not there to foster precaution and helplessness. In all their dealings governments should ensure that individuals' responsibilities are met and that individuals' liberties are respected.