Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Osama bin Laden: He's back ...

By Brad Berner - posted Tuesday, 31 January 2006

After a year of silence, Osama bin Laden has filled the world’s headlines with an audiotape, and the predictable opinions are being heard. Is his offering of a truce a sign of weakness or strength? Is he making such statements because he is harried or is the statement a result of the recent US missile attack in Pakistan? All of these questions are to be expected from a media that has usually asked: Is he really alive? Where is he? It rarely asks: What did he say or mean?

Bin Laden’s public statements - which have almost never been aired in full-length in the US mainstream media - have been made primarily based on his religious or ideological considerations. He has consistently justified al-Qaida’s actions and those of other jihad groups as a defensive struggle against Western encroachment on Islamic societies and the “apostate” regimes currently ruling Muslim countries. Moreover, he has consistently elaborated basic themes: one-sided US support for Israel at the expense of the Palestinians; US historical and current support for “apostate” Muslim regimes, such as that governing Saudi Arabia; the West’s pilfering of Muslims’ natural resources, especially oil; and the West’s cultural, political, and military attack on Muslims worldwide.

After the 9-11 attacks in New York City and Washington, D.C., al-Qaida was criticised by those within its own ideological persuasion, not for having attacked the US, but for not having followed correct religious procedures. It had failed to get the proper religious-legal rulings in support of such an attack; had not warned Muslims, women, children, and innocent civilians; and had not made an offer of peaceful resolution - all before attacking.


As of today, all of these conditions have been fulfilled with respect to the next attack in the US. Religious rulings have been obtained, warnings have been issued, and offers of a peaceful resolution - to accept a truce if the US offers one - have been made. In bin Laden’s mind, and in the minds of likeminded fundamentalist jihadists, all the preconditions have been met for directly attacking the United States. This is the real meaning of the audiotape.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

75 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brad K. Berner formerly taught at Arizona State University and is currently living and teaching in Moscow, Russia. He is the author of The World According to Al Qaeda (2005) and the forthcoming Jihad: Bin Laden in His Own Words (March 2006) and Quotations from Osama Bin Laden (March 2006).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brad Berner

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 75 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy