Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Speaking about the value of creativity

By Ralph Kerle - posted Wednesday, 25 January 2006


Most businesses and certainly governments and statisticians use words such as productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness to describe the popular notion of “value” in organisations and industry.

These words relate historically to tools of production and instruments of measurement that in the main were ways of evaluating and measuring value that were introduced in the Industrial Age. They were vital drivers for progress in the Industrial Age (mid 19th century to the 20th century) in that they provided ways of understanding and controlling our physical world, which have led to great advances in our standard of living.

The last two decades have been marked by the emergence of industries driven by knowledge and people rather than more easily controlled machines and production lines. There is now a vital need for a set of values carried by a different language: one that can describe business as moved by its prime asset, its people.

Advertisement

Lotte Darso, Research Director, the Creative Alliance, the Learning Lab, Denmark, in her ground-breaking book, Artful Creation - Tales of Art in Business argues that the importance of this shift in terminology is immense. But she suggests organisations are too busy with “business as usual” to really take this matter seriously. "When knowledge and competencies becomes the main asset, the real value of organisations is no longer material products controlled by business but knowledge in peoples’ heads and bodies".

She proposes that "product innovation is still important, but as Peter Drucker stresses in his concept The Knowledge Society, at least 50 per cent of innovation is social and concerns new ways of collaboration, new constellations (involving new types of people, for example, artists) and new processes of learning and knowledge creation".

Knowledge cannot be controlled. We cannot control the how and when of the production of knowledge - who knows where it is going to come from, from whom, how, and when? These are the unknowns. What we can do is set up the environment for knowledge to be encouraged, discussed, recognised, and then valued.

Thus the profound challenge for business and education contemporaneously is the reshaping of the popular language to allow us to define the processes that can bring to the surface knowledge production and reveal its value.

This dialogue will facilitate new business paradigms and the design of new educational programs for the new skills bases required for the growth and sustainability of knowledge-based industries. The right place to launch exploration of this new language will lie in the field of aesthetics - maybe in the classic arts and humanities faculties, but certainly not within the traditional business, marketing, and science schools or disciplines.

Steven Taylor and Hans Hansen in their paper "Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics" in the Journal of Management Studies (September 2005) suggest "aesthetics is concerned with knowledge that is created from our sensory experience. It also includes how our thoughts and feelings and reasoning around them inform our cognition."

Advertisement

If we look carefully at the distinction of aesthetic/sensory knowing versus intellectual/propositional knowing, which has been a prime driver through the Industrial Age, we find a distinction that is not just about how we know things, but why we know them.

Intellectual knowing is driven by a desire for clarity, objective truth, and ultimately instrumental goals. On the other hand, aesthetic knowing is driven by a desire for subjective, personal truth, typically for its own sake.

May Katherine Bateson, former Professor, the Harvard Graduate School of Education and former Dean of Social Studies and Humanities at the University of Northern Iran, smiles when she says, "The only thing I know is that when we are confronted by change in every day life, business or personal, we improvise … and in every civilisation ancient or modern, creativity is what drives improvisation."

Aesthetic knowing and practice is what drives that creativity, and it is through tapping into those rich personal narratives of aesthetic knowing that a new popular language will emerge.

We operate daily in a complex and chaotic ecology where our very survival and personal identity is tied up in improvising knowledgeable answers to problems using iterative processes we have adapted intuitively over time - our personal experience!

This is essentially the ecology of the artist. The artist must ask himself every day that he turns up to work in front of a blank canvas, a blank sheet of paper, or rehearsal room, “What IS the problem to be solved? How can I solve this problem?” And he works at it until the immediate problem is defined and solved. He then reflects on the overall value and quality of his work before proceeding to the next stage, and so on. It is an endlessly reflective process. This is why art and philosophy are closely linked.

In this way the artist's value is built on his creative experience, his ability to be able to make sense of what he is producing through improvisation, iteration, implementation, dialogues, collaborations, reflections, and pattern-seeking, while never having full control of his working output. And yet paradoxically, the artist invariably knows at what point the work is completed and how to speak about the value of this work - that is, its meaning and purpose.

In the business setting, the CEO and his or her team are presented daily with a set of problems in a complex and chaotic environment; they seek advice in whatever manner they feel is appropriate; they seek and assess to the best of their ability and knowledge solutions using a variety of techniques influenced by their personal reflective practice and experience and make a decision to act. This entire process could also describe the domain of the theatre director and his actors in daily rehearsals.

The operation of industry in the contemporary world very much reflects the ecology of the artist, and yet continues to use Industrial Age notions and language to gauge results.

The language of aesthetics seems currently to be confined in the corporate world to a discussion on the economic value of the art pieces on the wall as opposed to the hidden value of what it describes as its greatest assets, its people and their ability to be thoughtful and creative in solving problems.

There is more than a metaphorical paradox when the CEO addressing his shareholders at the Annual General Meeting refers to the balance sheet, observing that he has been extremely diligent in his handling of the corporate assets. He has depreciated them correctly in accordance with proper corporate governance. How should his greatest assets, his people, feel about this?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Article edited by Peter Coates.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This article is dedicated to the late Peter Drucker, one of the founders of management science.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ralph Kerle is CEO/Creative Director of Eventures Australia Pty. Ltd (experience design and production) and in that capacity he has worked for such Fortune 500 companies as Caltex, Fosters, Dairy Farmers, Foxtel, General Motors, Hewlett Packard, Kraft Foods, Nestle, Rolls Royce, Peugeot, Toyota, Telstra, Walt Disney, and Yellow Pages.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ralph Kerle

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ralph Kerle
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy