Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Home-buyers have laid enough golden eggs for government

By Elizabeth Crouch - posted Wednesday, 4 January 2006


This impost is just the latest in a series imposed by governments on the home building industry. In Sydney a range of taxes and charges for infrastructure development is adding more than $100,000 to the cost of new home in a city which is already one of the most expensive.

In recent weeks NSW home buyers have been facing yet another round of price increases following changes to long service leave levies and the introduction of a new assignor duty. The Iemma Government seems oblivious to the damage it is doing to one of the state’s most important industries and is making a mockery of its much touted slogan that NSW is “open for business”.

Housing is becoming a regulatory target for a range of outcomes seen as desirable by local authorities. Increasingly these local authorities are pursuing environmental or social housing agendas through planning regulations, encircling builders with ever-increasing layers of red tape. Even when these regulations do not actually involve payments, they often produce delays that result in additional costs to the developer which will eventually appear in the final price of the home.

Advertisement

During his recent visit to Australia, American public policy expert Wendell Cox identified the great Australian dream of home ownership as being at risk, with young households and low income earners increasingly relegated to a lifetime of renting.

Laying the blame squarely at the door of government regulation, he pointed out that equity in housing represents nearly one half of overall assets owned by the household sector. “Australia’s rising home ownership has been a principle factor in the tripling of real per capita incomes since World War II,” he said.

“Take home ownership away and there will be a weaker economy with fewer jobs and a future looking more grim than in the past. That would be a first for Australia, or for any high-income world nation - and for no reason.”

Governments at all levels - federal, state and local - must review their attitudes to the housing industry as a matter of urgency. The goose has already laid more than its fair share of golden eggs and is beginning to look very sick. Remedial action is urgently required.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Elizabeth Crouch is the Housing Industry Association’s senior executive director – Industry Policy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Elizabeth Crouch

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Elizabeth Crouch
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy