Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Paying mothers to have children must stop

By Jason Falinski - posted Wednesday, 11 January 2006


The policy objective itself is also interesting. It is not like the world needs more people. And it is not like Australia has problems finding people - skilled or unskilled - to come to this country.

And what we do know from over four decades of research is that welfare programs that encourage single parent households to have more children are destructive and counterproductive in the short and long run, especially for the children and mothers.

Earlier this year, the outer Sydney suburb of Macquarie Fields was in riot. The cause is often sheeted home to the slow police response. Most social scientists would sooner conclude that the causes of this riot happened over several decades. A combination of poor housing development, a lack of social infrastructure, a welfare state that perpetuated problems it was meant to fix, and a general lack of investment in human capital.

Advertisement

How payments for simply having children helps resolve problems like Macquarie Fields is a mystery. It has created a situation in which households that are least able to afford children in terms of time and financial burden have more children.

Finally, there are the tax consequences of running social policy through the tax system. As The Australian reported (30/11/05) growth in deductions have far outstripped growth in salaries:

Wages and salaries declared to the tax office have risen by just 5.6 per cent a year … Capital gains have soared by almost five times that amount, at 27.3 per cent.

Rental deductions (8.9 per cent a year) have been growing faster than rental income (7.9 per cent) and work-related expenses (8.5 per cent) are out-pacing wages and salaries (5.6 per cent) - despite repeated crackdowns from the tax office to curb claims.

Using the tax system to promote social outcomes only encourages this sort of perversion, where the rich pay less and the poor and middle classes keep paying more.

Payments tied to the production of children, and not tied to other outcomes, promotes social outcomes that are perverse and harmful, environmental outcomes that are an anathema to our survival, and only serve to hurt the people they are meant to help through a tax system that increasingly resembles a piece of Emmentaler cheese. Such payments should be scrapped before they do any more harm.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

111 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jason Falinski is managing director of CareWell a provider of furniture and equipment to the health sector, and a former national president of the Young Liberal Movement.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jason Falinski

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jason Falinski
Article Tools
Comment 111 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy