Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

An unsound approach to teaching

By Kevin Donnelly - posted Wednesday, 30 November 2005


The Deans of Education also argues that learning cannot be restricted to what is termed the old basics: where there are right and wrong answers and correct grammar and spelling. Instead, the deans argue:

Good learners will not come to any situation with pre-ordained, known answers. Rather, they will come equipped with problem-solving skills, multiple strategies for tackling a task, and a flexible solutions-orientation to knowledge.

Ignored is the reality that there is a right and a wrong way to teach children how to read and that no amount of "edubabble" can disguise the fact that reading is highly unnatural and totally unlike learning how to speak.

Advertisement

Finally, much of the Rowe Report is based on the belief that increased testing, assessment and reporting will lead to improved literacy skills. The focus on measurement, given that it represents a significant part of the ACER’s research interest, is understandable.

From a teacher’s viewpoint, the concern is that a preoccupation with testing and accountability diverts teachers from the real task at hand, teaching children how to read and being given the right tools to do the job.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

First published in The Australian on November 19, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

32 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian Catholic University and he recently co-chaired the review of the Australian national curriculum. He can be contacted at kevind@netspace.net.au. He is author of Australia’s Education Revolution: How Kevin Rudd Won and Lost the Education Wars available to purchase at www.edstandards.com.au

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kevin Donnelly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kevin Donnelly
Article Tools
Comment 32 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy