Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Be happy not rich

By John McKinnon - posted Thursday, 17 November 2005


Layard’s conclusion is that taxation is therefore corrective, not distorting. This is a fundamental challenge to conventional thinking. According to these (admittedly) approximate numbers, a top marginal taxation rate of 60 per cent would be a “neutral” figure. It is, in fact, the typical marginal tax rate in Europe, where happiness is generally greater than in the US or Britain. The decreasing positive impact of wealth increases on happiness also suggests a strongly progressive taxation rather than the flatter income tax regimes being pushed currently (not to mention the regressive GST).

As described above, job security is a major source of happiness and unemployment a major source of misery. Under the proposed WorkChoices legislation, individuals should be able to trade security for income or other conditions. However, in practice, individuals do not have this choice: any such suggestion will cast doubt on one’s willingness to work. It is clear therefore, that job security and additional time for family and community activities (key drivers of happiness) need to be negotiated collectively. The WorkChoices proposal, with its emphasis on flexibility and individual negotiation, may potentially increase productivity and therefore wealth, but is bound to decrease happiness.

While not going into detail, it is clear that policies relating to health, family and community are also key to promoting happiness. Layard reports that mental illness causes the most misery in society. However, a recent report (“Goverment program failing unemployed: report", SMH, October 25, 2005) concluded government programs were significantly under-funded and under resourced. To make significant inroads into unhappiness, the resources applied to mental health would need to be increased significantly.

Advertisement

One further policy area demands mention. Television creates discontent by bombarding us with images of perfection and promising that we can achieve these through increased consumption. These promises are of course false but the process increases feelings of discontent. Hence arguably television advertising directly reduces happiness. Both Layard and Hamilton recommend restrictions on advertising including bans in advertising to children under 12-years-old. Layard suggests that all advertising be limited to the provision of factual information while Hamilton goes even further. Such proposals may seem radical but only “radical” if society’s aim were to maximise wealth and not happiness.

Wealth and happiness are not necessarily mutually exclusive. However, for those of us in western countries, pursuit of one may lead to less of the other. The current consensus is that wealth maximisation should be the goal of public policy. Richard Layard has now given us an alternative. The challenge now is to convince our major political parties that we would rather be happy than rich.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Peter Coates.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

44 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John McKinnon is the NSW State Co-ordinator for Tear Australia, a Christian aid and development organisation. Until mid 2005, John worked as a senior executive in the finance industry. He lives in Sydney with his wife and four children. John has a BSc (Hons) in mathematics and an MA in Biblical Studies (New Testament).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John McKinnon

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John McKinnon
Article Tools
Comment 44 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy