Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

All software ain't just software!

By Cameron Riley - posted Thursday, 6 October 2005


The reason is twofold. Popular open-source projects develop source code, features, modifications, improvements and releases at a prodigious rate. The level of productivity in an open-source project with a critical mass of developers is exceptional. Second, once code has been BSD'ed or GPL'ed, and has a vibrant open-source developer and user community behind it, it is commoditised. There is no going back.

It becomes irrelevant to a company if they can lock that software away in binary code and abuse the license. One way to compete in a commodity market is through volume by taking smaller and smaller margins. Open-source projects are available for free from the project's own website, so hoping to make a living from razor thin margins in a volume business is impossible. The other way to survive in a commodity market is through innovation. Again this is impossible for a company, as open-source projects out-innovate, out-collaborate and are more productive for far less cost than a business can achieve.

Recently Eric Raymond argued that the GPL was not needed anymore, stating, "We don't need the GPL anymore. It's based on the belief that open-source software is weak and needs to be protected." In contrast Matt Asay argued that the GPL was the superior license, writing, "The GPL is one of the most exciting, innovative capitalist tools ever created. The GPL breaks down walls between vendors and customers while enabling strong competitive differentiation."

Advertisement

I don't think the license wars matter. I have used all manner of open-source licenses in systems and have contributed to open-source projects. The fact of the matter is, once software gets open-sourced it has become a commodity. The genie is out of the bottle. Whether it is licensed under the BSD, GPL, LGPL, APL or MPL is irrelevant. Once software is commoditised, the most competitive organisational form in that market is an open-source developer and user community. It is an extremely rare business that can beat zero dollars, and the productivity rates of a distributed software developer system.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Patrick O'Neill.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Cameron Riley is founder of South Sea Republic. He authored the book, The K-fivical Cam, and has co-authored South Sea Republic Volume One as well as the recently released book, Patterns of Liberty.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Cameron Riley

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy