Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Religious tolerance will ensure community safety

By Mark Zirnsak - posted Wednesday, 24 August 2005


An environment of hate and hostility towards a group of people increases the likelihood that such people will be physically attacked, have their property attacked and be discriminated against. It is likely to cause members of that community to live in fear.

The national Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission released a report in 2004 documenting increased levels of discrimination against Arabs and Muslims in Australia following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the US and the terrorist bombing in Bali in October 2002. Muslim women were particular targets of physical violence carried out by strangers. Such incidents included having dogs set upon them, attempts to run over them, being spat at, having things thrown at them from cars and having their hajibs pulled off. The victims of such attacks often fear leaving their homes.

However, harassment and discrimination has also been directed at people mistaken as Muslims, such as Christian Arabs and Sikh men wearing turbans. In one case an Egyptian Christian woman was knocked to the ground and needed hospital treatment after a man threw stones at her from a passing car.

Advertisement

At the same time we do not want to allow Islamic extremists to have a free hand to circulate their literature seeking to incite attacks against people of other faiths. If the campaign to have the Act repealed were to be successful the only winners would be individuals and groups that seek to incite religious and racial hatred in our community and those who would support acts of terrorism.

I support changes to the Act to make it more difficult for complaints that are frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance from proceeding before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and wrote to all Victorian MPs making this suggestion last month. Justice Morris made the same recommendation in his recent ruling. This only strengthens the law against those that seek to misuse it, without watering down the community protection it provides.

I can only hope that those currently engaged in the misinformation campaign take the time to read Justice Morris’s decision, before they plough on with their misguided and uninformed campaign to repeal the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Betsy Fysh.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

56 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Mark Zirnsak is the Director of Justice and International Mission of the Uniting Church.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 56 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy