Corby highlights our lingering 'White Australia' sentiment

“How dare they …!” Schapelle Corby’s sister reacted truculently when the judge handed down the 20-year sentence in a Bali Court. Her eyes were fixed on the bench, her mouth stretched sideways, as she punched out her words.

That says it all for me: How dare these Indonesians do this to us, Australians? These unrefined, uncivilised, and unreasonable Asiatics! Did they take no notice of the strong feelings we had about them in the weeks leading up to the sentencing? Didn’t they know that we expected them to do the right thing by us, on our terms?

The irony is the Indonesian judges might even have done just that. Twenty years was probably the shortest sentence they could have imposed, without compromising their recently acquired judicial independence. I just hope that the appeal will not turn out to be a folly, resulting in a life sentence for Corby.

For weeks before the sentencing, we mobilised a “hate-the-Indonesians” crusade - led by some scurrilous hosts of talkback radio, and reinforced by the editorial lapses or duplicity of our daily newspapers. Towards the end, some contrary views for a sane assessment of the situation were published. Alas, too late. The harm was done, just like the Pauline Hanson wagon half a dozen years ago.

When the white powder letter sent to the Indonesian Embassy was sensationalised in the media, our PM went on television and sanctimoniously chided the letter’s perpetrator. That did the trick. Overnight the crusade came to a standstill.

Why did John Howard not get on to the TV earlier, when the crusade was in its infancy? He is said to be one of the most astute readers of the mood of the electorate.

My guess is that he did the same as he did in 1996 when Pauline Hanson used parliament to vilify Asians and Aboriginals by turning it to his political advantage. He defended Hanson’s right to speak her mind, knowing that Hanson had accidentally commandeered the lightning rod for the growing band of the economically disenfranchised. No doubt other strategic considerations on his political agenda also counted. But the anguish Hanson caused the Aboriginals and Asians seemed incidental, and the harm done to our nation’s nobler instincts paled against the imperatives of his own destiny. He was sure to have known that Hanson had rubbed the racist scar on our national psyche.

Some three years later, in 1998, Pauline Hanson’s nascent One Nation Party attracted a million voters, largely from conservative moorings, with poor educational background and low socio-economic status. Has Howard unleashed a political tidal wave? For a while things were looking grim for him. Then the Tampa came, just before the 2001 Federal Elections, and Howard unashamedly appropriated Hanson’s mouthings on boat people and asylum seekers, and crafted the border security ruse to win back the Hanson voters for himself. In the process he vilified all asylum seekers on boats, culminating in his televised crescendo: “I don’t want that kind of people in Australia. I really don’t!” In one orchestrated performance, Howard shoved Pauline Hanson off stage, and made himself “the father” of our nation.

There is a big difference this time in the Corby case. Howard is in a very relaxed position, with an opposition utterly self-emasculated through the antics of their factional mafias, and Pauline Hanson just a memory. And I guess he might have his eye on history too - how he will be remembered.

(Think of the Lynton Crosby survey in early 2002 which featured prominently in The Australian - just after the senate inquiry exposed the lie of the children overboard affair - that Australians voted on the economic record of Howard’s Government and not on the border security issue. Why?)

So he waited for the right moment. To weigh in at the beginning would have been tantamount to provoking those on the crusade, particularly those voters won back from Hanson. As well, he would have been putting offside those opinion leaders on talkback radio whom he had cultivated for his own political ends in the past decade or so.

Howard could not have played the race card so successfully all on his own. The populace must have been ready to hear his “dog whistles”.

As an Asian immigrant of 43 years’ standing, this is what I see as the underbelly of our culture. That scar of our racist past, a heritage largely born out of the fear of a white outpost being overrun by the “yellow peril” -  perhaps first triggered by the rapid disappearance of the subjugated Aboriginal peoples -  can still be fomented to incite hatred of “the other” whenever a political or social situation beckons.

Australia has given me a good life. It is the homeland of my children. Unlike Robert Menzies, who in 1966 intimated over a nightcap that he hoped we would never change the White Australia policy, I hope fervently that we will be a great nation one day.

The Corby case lights up the remains of our 19th century orientalist outlook. But the reflection on our soul is lost in the glare of our searchlights still focused on finding the “yellow peril”, the “red menace”: the terrorist-laden boat people with menacing beliefs and pathogens; the recalcitrant Indonesians refusing to do the right thing by us. Meanwhile China seems to have become the new land of opportunity, a model of economic growth and prosperity! The Chinese have money to buy all our things.

In a case that is unfolding it would appear that in the early 1990s our courts sent five Japanese tourists to jail here for having heroin hidden in false compartments in their suitcases. Our prosecutor insisted that they should have noticed the change in weight when the new suitcases were handed over to them in Kuala Lumpur by Charlie - their tour guide in that city - to replace their damaged suitcases en route from Japan.

The evidence that Charlie, later jailed in Malaysia for other offences, admitted that he slashed their suit-cases deliberately and gave them the replacement ones, was never presented in the court hearings in Australia. The taped interrogation by the Victorian police also revealed a police interpreter saying that he had no idea what the Japanese tourist was talking about!

And there was just one interpreter for the five tourists. Professor Paul Wilson, criminologist at Bond University, is working to clear the name of Miko, one of the five tourists, now back in Japan, after early release and deportation while on parole. She was 19 when she got her 15-year sentence. Corby by contrast is 27, and no one could find any evidence that her bag had been tampered with.

I don’t remember any sympathy for those young and vulnerable Japanese tourists who would have worked long hours all year before their short annual holidays. It is also curious that this has only come to light now, and not when the “hate-the-Indonesian” crusade was in progress during the Corby case.

Maybe it is just that our collective memory is sloppy, and our judicial system far from perfect. But I doubt it.

Deep down in our national psyche, we are still the superior white, and they, the Asiatics, are still inferior and to be exploited. Yes, they are also exotic, eager to please, and can be corrupted - the remains of our 19th century Orientalist outlook.

Remember the case, a couple of years ago when a consular official counselled an Australian pedophile awaiting sentence to escape that Asian country? She issued a new passport to him to replace his confiscated one in order to effect his escape.

Yep, Asians are all right, provided that they do not do the wrong thing by us. How dare they!