Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Voters' views on the federal Budget: no longer 'relaxed and comfortable'

By Tim Grau - posted Tuesday, 28 June 2005


Initially, voters were at best dismissive or cynical of Beazley's promise to oppose the tax cuts. However when discussion turned to his promised tax cut and his proposed "Building Australia Fund" voters were very supportive of the plans.

On the plan to oppose the Government's tax cuts:

  • "Dear Old Kimmie is doing his usual stunt - God Bless Him!!"
  • "… sure it’s not just delaying the inevitable?"
  • "Beazley is making a mistake here."
  • "I don't think it means much, he and the rest of Oz knows the government gets majority in July."
Advertisement

Labor voters, however, where more supportive of Beazley's stance:

  • "He can't win this, but at least he has presented an alternative rather than just criticising the government."
  • "Probably good positioning in a political sense - if people in the middle eventually realise they got very little form the budget."
  • "It's the best stance Beazley has ever made, the workers will remember the principal (sic) at the next election."

Beazley's own proposed tax cuts received a warmer reception among voters:

  • "I agree with Beazley's tax structure."
  • "If Beazley can work this out why didn't Costello?"
  • "Probably sensible."
  • "If we have to have tax cuts Beazley's are preferable."
  • "Hope he can do it - but need to know the ALP's plans for the economy."

Similarly, voters were initially attracted to Beazley's "Building Australia Fund" but wanted to know more details.

John Howard v Peter Costello

Voters were contemptuous of the debate surrounding Peter Costello's ambition to lead the Liberal Party and whether or not John Howard should stand down before the next election.

Advertisement

They views were strongly expressed and ranged from dismissively uninterested to outright disgust.

  • "Boring and trivial. Who cares?"
  • "It is a distraction and I really don't care."
  • "Pathetic couple of school boys."
  • "John and Peter is like watching two five-year-olds argue over who's Daddy is better!"
  • "I think they both need to grow up and run the country and leave the leadership issue to the party to decide."
  • "The leader is chosen by vote, it is not a decision between Howard and Costello."
  • "They are both detestable. Who cares?"

Unfortunately for the would-be Prime Minister much of the vitriol was directed towards Costello. Voters thought he should "put up or shut up" and or were very critical of his view that he deserved the leadership.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tim Grau is a one-time adviser to former Queensland Labor premier Wayne Goss and ex-federal attorney-general Michael Lavarch. He is the founding director of the public affairs firm, Springboard Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim Grau

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy