Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Best not to follow the leader polls

By Peter Van Onselen and Wayne Errington - posted Friday, 27 May 2005


The natural order of affairs is for incumbents to outrate their opponents in polls, even when the government is unpopular. Just look at Keating versus Howard in 1996, when Keating ran on strong leadership, led Howard in the preferred prime minister stakes, yet was thrashed at the election.

Beazley wouldn't want to make this mistake from Opposition, only focusing on being remembered for his newly found "ticker". We already have seen a snapshot of how he gets portrayed in the media - as a man not with ticker, but wanting ticker, or at least the appearance of ticker.

The Federal Government has its share of problems. It houses a deputy desperate to elevate to the leadership, with a likely ugly showdown just around the corner. It has reneged on the election promise of a low threshold Medicare safety net, and it has a tax cut package that delivers 80 per cent of Australians a worse deal than Labor's model. Throw in a cooling housing market and a drought threatening the Budget bottom line, and the Coalition may not be the political Goliath it so often is portrayed to be.

Advertisement

These weaknesses can be exploited by a party in the hunt come the next election. It is the party vote that will tell us if they are, not the preferred prime minister poll.

Beazley wants to be seen as having ticker. The best way to do that is by winning the next election. Just ask Rann, Bracks, Carr and Gallop, all of whom were seen as unpopular opposition leaders lacking strength. Ask Howard, who before becoming prime minister was seen only as an unpopular opposition leader lacking stature. Things change from the government benches.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Courier-Mail on May 26, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Dr Peter van Onselen is Associate Professor of Politics and Government School of Communications and Arts at Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia.

Dr Wayne Errington lectures in politics at the Australian National University. His book, co authored with Peter Van Onselen, John Winston Howard: The Biography (Melbourne University Press), is due for release later this year.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Peter Van Onselen
All articles by Wayne Errington

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy