Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The federal government must increase its investment in the environment

By Peter Garrett - posted Tuesday, 13 May 2003


If we're serious about addressing salinity and the poor health of our rivers, we need to introduce a national land and water repair levy. That's the view of the Australian Conservation Foundation and the National Farmers Federation.

We also need to encourage greater private-sector investment. A recent report for business leaders showed that federal government funding can "leverage" or stimulate major private sector investment in natural resource management. It's estimated that for every dollar of federal government funding, $3.50 in private-sector funding can be leveraged.

It's also time we committed ourselves to trying to prevent some of these problems from occurring in the first place. It is far cheaper to prevent land degradation and the loss of plants and animals than it is to try to bring a species back from the brink of extinction or to restore a degraded river system.

Advertisement

The Prime Minister's Science, Engineering and Innovation Council has advised him that every dollar spent now on controlling land clearing will return twenty in the long term. So putting money into prevention makes good sense.

What can we get for this investment? Apart from preventing the loss of good land, so needed for rural communities to live productively, the degradation of our greatest river system and climate changing greenhouse gases, we can save our songbirds and gum trees, our unique animals and special natural places. And we can feel better knowing we didn't let a mass extinction happen with the full knowledge of how to stop it.

If the environment is really one of the federal government's third-term priorities, then there must be a substantial increase in environment spending in this year's Budget. If the Opposition is really serious about addressing environmental problems, then they must identify how they will fix these problems. This budget is the true test.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 9 May 2003.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Garrett is the Labor Member for Kingsford Smith in New South Wales. Peter is widely known as a passionate advocate and campaigner on a range of contemporary Australian and global issues. He was the former president Australian Conservation Foundation , an activist, and former member Australian band Midnight Oil.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Garrett
Related Links
Australian Conservation Foundation
Budget 2003
The ACF's analysis of the Australian Terrestrial Biodiversity Assessment
Photo of Peter Garrett
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy