Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Wadderloader! Maths and science teaching in Australia

By John Ridd - posted Tuesday, 25 January 2005


Moreover, for upper secondary school many syllabi in maths, physics and chemistry are vague and provide little idea of what content material and concepts are required learning. It is quite possible for students from neighbouring schools to be following two completely different courses. The implications for tertiary faculties are serious. Assessment systems are essentially non-numerate, depend heavily on items that may or may not be the students' own work and over emphasise English. A recent Parliamentary inquiry into the education of boys recommended that:

Assessment procedures for maths and sciences must, as a first requirement, provide information about students’ knowledge, skills and achievement on the subject, and not be a de facto examination of students' English comprehension.

The fact that such an obvious statement was deemed necessary demonstrates the “wadderloader” condition of many “assessment” systems.

Advertisement

Boys from lower socio-economic backgrounds are frequently weaker in literacy than girls of similar background and are much weaker in English than mathematics. Hence making maths and the physical sciences a “de facto test of English comprehension” is socially and sexually discriminatory.

Any improvement in participation and performance in the enabling sciences is dependent on dramatic improvements in the standards of maths and numerical science in lower secondary schooling and the construction of syllabi that ensure that outcomes are reliable, validated and defined. Those improvements will not emanate from within “The Education Establishment”. Only parliaments can produce the improvements that are urgently needed. As a start they should take a club to the various Boards of Study (under whatever name). It is impossible to overstate how influential those institutions are - for good or evil. Certainly they are much more significant than either teacher unions or the public versus private debate because they determine everything in all subjects in all years and in all schools without exception.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Ridd taught and lectured in maths and physics in UK, Nigeria and Queensland. He co-authored a series of maths textbooks and after retirement worked for and was awarded a PhD, the topic being 'participation in rigorous maths and science.'

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Ridd
Photo of John Ridd
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy