Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

What to do with Tsunami victims and environmental refugees?

By Tanveer Ahmed - posted Thursday, 13 January 2005


For example, New Zealand calls the citizens it is accepting from sinking Tuvalu as members of a "migration program". The government is doing its best to keep the program as low-key as possible, concerned that conservative groups could exploit the Tuvaluan example for political advantage.

There has been ongoing debate within the United Nations. In 2003 it decided it should not change the law to include those fleeing natural disaster. Their key argument was that environmental refugees were of a cyclical kind. Natural disasters came and went. Those who flee tend to return, or should return, when the disaster subsides, according to the argument.

But this is very unlikely to occur for most of the tsunami survivors.

Advertisement

The UN argued that the term "refugee" should be protected for those people whose governments have failed them. By this argument you can run away from a cyclone but you won't get refugee status. While a cyclone can maim and destroy you, it can't persecute you.

The Australian government believes it is a non-issue. If the UN doesn't care, nor do we, is the essence of their case. But global realities have a way of forcing the hand of the law. Like the forces of technology, the vexed issue of climate change is likely to outpace the tortoise-like progress of any parallel law and regulation.

As the scale of the tsunami has illustrated, global problems require global responsibility.

Climate change is a reality. Increasing numbers of people fleeing natural disaster are a reality. However, this is not mirrored under international law and the impoverished nations which are most affected will continue to suffer.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Tanveer Ahmed is a psychiatrist, author and local councillor. His first book is a migration memoir called The Exotic Rissole. He is a former SBS journalist, Fairfax columnist and writes for a wide range of local and international publications.
He was elected to Canada Bay Council in 2012. He practises in western Sydney and rural NSW.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tanveer Ahmed
Photo of Tanveer Ahmed
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy