Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Sending troops into conflict must be a decision for Parliament, not the PM

By Andrew Bartlett - posted Friday, 11 April 2003


Indeed, the costs of that war and all 20th century wars continue to this day, in physical and psychological damage, in the broken lives and broken families of too many veterans.

That is why it is so important that we repeatedly make the point that we support the troops presently involved in the war on Iraq, and we must support them when they return. We must let them talk and we must listen, and we must always remember that they have shown a willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice for this nation. It is not fair to ask them to also determine Government policy.

In support of this Bill, the example provided is that of the current war on Iraq. This is also a much more pronounced example of the Executive, and in effect the Prime Minister, making a decision to commit troops to overseas conflict, without the support of the Parliament or of the people of Australia.

Advertisement

It is the Democrats belief that this war is unwise, immoral and illegal under international law. Even if we were to believe the government's case that this war is legal, it would set a precedent that makes it easier and therefore more likely for governments to go to war.

The fact that the government is pursing a doctrine of pre-emptive strike makes this Bill all the more important.

In March last year the PM - while in London - reportedly stated his belief that the Australian public would support extending our involvement in the war on terrorism to other theatres such as Iraq.

The Democrats first questioned the Minister for Defence that month - 12 months ago - about Australia's potential involvement in a war on Iraq. We called, as long ago as May and June of last year, for full Parliamentary debates on this issue and for there to be a conscience vote on any deployment or involvement of Australian troops. We have since then asked many questions and moved many motions, some of which got ALP support, some - for example our motion in August to refer the matter to the Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee for inquiry - that the ALP would not support.

It took until 17 September 2002 until the Foreign Affairs Minister put a statement on Iraq to the Parliament for debate, and it was not until 4 February this year that the Prime Minister stepped forward and made a statement to the Parliament.

That statement did not make the case for the extreme action of committing Australia to war.

Advertisement

By the time the Prime Minister made his statement to the Parliament in February, he had already offered up the use of Pine Gap and Australian facilities and ports to US warships. Then he offered up our troops.

He effectively handed over the decision of whether Australia would go to war to someone that no Australian voted for - US President George Bush.

All the time the government continued to deny that they had committed us to war. Despite the fact they had already drawn up the Budget - which they refuse to disclose, admitting only that the deployment - not the war but the deployment alone - would cost "some hundreds of millions of dollars". The Treasurer now claims that the entire war will cost "several hundred million dollars". I will be surprised if it in fact costs under one billion dollars.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This is an edited version of the Second Reading of the Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Approval For Australian Involvement In Overseas Conflicts) Bill 2003, 27/3/03.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Andrew Bartlett has been active in politics for over 20 years, including as a Queensland Senator from 1997-2008. He graduated from University of Queensland with a degree in social work and has been involved in a wide range of community organisations and issues, including human rights, housing, immigration, Indigneous affairs, environment, animal rights and multiculturalism. He is a member of National Forum. He blogs at Bartlett's Blog.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Bartlett
Related Links
Andrew Bartlett's National Forum page
Australian Democrats
Australian Parliament
Photo of Andrew Bartlett
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy