Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Saddam has been taking Iraqi blood in exchange for oil for years

By Jim Nolan - posted Wednesday, 22 January 2003


What appears to be beyond the grasp of many in the West is the scale and scope of a modern totalitarianism regime such as Saddam's. It is truly - to use Iraqi dissident Kanan Makiya's term - a "Republic of Fear". It is a regime which conducts its ruthless totalitarian control through an estimated 280,00 secret police, and treats its populace with complete contempt, as the recent humiliation dealt to the Iraqi people by Saddam's 'referendum' demonstrated yet again.

There is incontrovertible evidence to suggest that Saddam has acted in continuous violation of the disarmament conditions of the post Kuwait cease-fire. As recently as 2000 Saddam engaged with the criminal Milosevic regime in joint activities to produce weapons of mass destruction.

That Saddam's December declaration to the United Nations is conspicuously flawed should come as a surprise to no one. He is an old lag with form. He has violated every agreement to which he has subscribed - how can anyone credibly suggest that he will change now?

Advertisement

Can the view of ordinary Iraqis be ascertained on these issues? One can be excused for wishing to look past the recent grotesque 'referendum' that delivered Saddam a 99.9 per cent vote of approval. Interestingly, the Brussels-based International Crisis Group (headed by former Australian Foreign Minister Gareth Evans) conducted an informal survey of Iraqi opinion in September and October 2002 in major Iraqi cities. It observed that a significant number of the Iraqis interviewed, "with surprising candour, expressed their view that, if such a change required an American-led attack, they would support it."

Something more substantial than the vacuous 'no blood for oil' chant will be required to dissuade those of us on the left who dissent from the empty 'no war on Iraq' rhetoric. Those who have followed closely the grotesque history of the Saddam regime recognise the dire need, on human rights grounds alone, for regime change in Iraq. So too, it seems more will be necessary to dissuade the bulk of ordinary Iraqis - the real victims of Saddam's blood for oil campaign - against the desirability of regime change.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jim Nolan is an old fashioned social democrat and Sydney Barrister with an interest in Human Rights. He is a long-standing member of the Australian Labor Party.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jim Nolan
Related Links
International Crisis Group
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy