Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The hour of unrestricted escalation: why Kyiv must write off Washington and strike the heart of Moscow’s war machine

By Liang Nah - posted Thursday, 5 November 2026


It is a truism of realpolitik that nations have no permanent allies, only permanent interests. Yet, even by the standard of cold power diplomacy, Washington's recent manoeuvres represent a breathtaking betrayal of moral coherence, statutory law, and Western security. The administration's recent decision to waive sanctions on Russian oil to procure Moscow's diesel - directly funnelling US dollars into Vladimir Putin's war chest - was a stark violation of statutory restrictions designed to penalize aggression against Ukraine. When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy gently criticized this as a "weak decision" by the US, Washington's reaction was petulant and swift. Media misrepresentations transformed the critique into an accusation that Trump himself was "weak," sparking an outburst that denounced the Ukrainian leadership and called for political shifts in Kyiv.

What followed went far beyond diplomatic bluster. In a campaign of quiet retaliation, discussions mounted over restricting crucial US intelligence sharing with Kyiv, leaving Ukrainian air defence networks compromised against incoming Russian missile strikes and leading to preventable civilian deaths. Simultaneously, Washington ordered the technical throttling of SpaceX's military-grade satellite infrastructure, imposing speed limits on Starshield terminals moving faster than 160 km/h. This deliberate restriction sabotaged Ukraine's high-speed interceptor drones and forced the aborting of critical defence missions. Analysts rightly recognized these coercive measures as "shots across the bow" - calculated warnings meant to force Kyiv to cease attacks on Russian energy assets so that tentative commercial deals between Washington and Moscow could proceed unhindered.

Desperate times and desperate measures

As analysts now warn, Washington could in future permanently abrogate intelligence sharing, disable Starshield indefinitely, and withhold weapons already purchased by Kyiv under the Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative. Having shown itself to be less of a reliable guarantor and more of an extortionist mafia boss demanding capitulation, Washington under the current administration can no longer be regarded as an ally. For Kyiv, the illusion of American patronage is shattered. The only logical national security response left is an uninhibited, all-out "go for broke" counter-offensive.

Advertisement

If Ukraine has been conserving its long-range strike inventories for a proverbial rainy day, it must recognize that the sky is already pouring. Deference to Western sensitivities has yielded neither protection nor peace; it has merely allowed Moscow to systematically destroy Ukraine's energy grid while protecting its own economic engine. It is time for Kyiv to unleash its indigenous long-range strike capabilities across the full depth of the Russian Federation, systematically dismantling four critical pillars of Moscow's war effort.

The four-pillar target architecture

  • Energy export infrastructure:Kyiv must relentlessly target Russia's maritime petroleum terminals, export pipelines, and loading ports in the Baltic and Black Seas. Cutting off Moscow's ability to export crude oil and refined petroleum is the single most direct way to collapse the Kremlin's tax revenues and paralyze its foreign currency reserves.
  • Petroleum refineries and fuel distribution hubs:Beyond raw exports, Russia's internal refining capacity must be ground to a halt. Striking cracking towers, fuel storage depots, and military fuel staging areas will starve the Russian Armed Forces of diesel and aviation fuel, bringing mechanized manoeuvres and aerial sorties to a shuddering halt.
  • Logistics, freight, and transport nodes:Russia's war machine relies overwhelmingly on rail, heavy trucking, and centralized warehousing to sustain its front line. Systematic saturation strikes on major railway junction yards, freight handling facilities, maintenance depots, and bridge bottlenecks will sever the military supply lines feeding Russian occupation forces.
  • Command, control, and data infrastructure:Long-range strikes must prioritize communication nodes, military command posts, and data centres handling war effort logistics. Disruption of these digital command structures creates operational paralysis, leaving frontline Russian formations isolated and uncoordinated.

That Kyiv has already been doing all these to greater or lesser extents through both direct action and partisan sabotage is proof of Ukrainian strategic wisdom. What is needed is an unrestrained campaign that disregards whatever Trump wants (such as a moratorium on attacking Russian oil infrastructure), as his desires are inimical to Ukrainian national interests.

Unleashing the indigenous arsenal

Kyiv no longer needs to plead for permission to use foreign-supplied weapons. Through relentless engineering and domestic industrial mobilization, Ukraine now possesses a formidable home-grown long-range arsenal capable of executing this campaign independently.

The backbone of Ukraine's initial deep-strike strategy - one-way attack drones like the FP-1 and the proven AN-196 Lyutyi - has already demonstrated the ability to penetrate hundreds of kilometres into Russian airspace to strike refineries. Complementing these are heavy cruise missiles like the ground-launched Long Neptune and the high-payload FP-5 Flamingo cruise missile, boasting a 3,000-kilometre range and a massive 1,150 kg warhead capable of obliterating heavily fortified industrial targets.

Crucially, Ukraine's operational calculus is being transformed by the introduction of domestically produced ballistic missiles. The newly deployed FP-7 tactical ballistic missile provides rapid, high-velocity suppression of air-defence batteries like the Russian S-400, punching localized gaps in enemy radar coverage. Meanwhile, the development of the long-range FP-9 ballistic missile - capable of delivering an 800 kg payload up to 850 kilometres - gives Kyiv the ability to reliably level high-value command structures and industrial hubs, including targets deep inside Moscow, with minimal flight time and near-zero window for interception.

Advertisement

The necessary parth ahead

President Zelenskyy's refusal to "bend the knee" to extortion from Washington is not merely a matter of national dignity; it is a strategic necessity. A White House that sacrifices democratic allies to secure petroleum deals and backroom political arrangements has forfeited its moral authority.

Ukraine cannot allow its survival to be dictated by the whims of a transactional administration in Washington or the aggression of a tyrant in Moscow. The time for hesitation, political compromise, and strategic restraint is over. By deploying its full arsenal of drones, cruise missiles, and new ballistic systems against Russia's core energy and logistical infrastructure, Kyiv can seize the initiative, impose intolerable costs on the Kremlin, and secure its own destiny through strength alone.

  1. Pages:
  2. ‹
  3. 1
  4. ›
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Liang Tuang Nah is an Associate Research Fellow at the Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies, a constituent unit of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Liang Nah

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy