Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Iran war exposes the illusions of energy policy

By Ronald Stein and Yoshihiro Muronaka - posted Thursday, 28 May 2026


Stiell's claim that renewables are "cheaper" also requires scrutiny. The Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) - the metric most commonly cited by renewable advocates - reflects only the cost of generating electricity from a given facility. It does not account for the full system costs required to integrate intermittent sources into a grid: backup power, battery storage, transmission infrastructure, and demand balancing. When these are included in a Full Cost of Energy (FCOE) assessment, the economic case for renewables weakens considerably.

This problem is particularly acute in developing nations, where grid infrastructure is limited or absent. Deploying renewables in such contexts without accounting for full system costs does not deliver cheap electricity - it delivers unreliable electricity at a hidden premium. If Stiell is serious about electricity affordability for the developing world, he owes them an honest accounting of LCOE versus FCOE.

The China Reality Check

There is a deeper problem with the narrative that developed-nation renewable acceleration will meaningfully address global emissions. China currently emits approximately 11.7 billion tons of COâ‚‚ annually - roughly 31% of the global total. The entire developed world's reduction efforts, however sincere and costly, are being outpaced by China's continued expansion of coal-fired power generation.

Advertisement

China has pledged carbon neutrality by 2060 and peak emissions by 2030. Yet in 2023 and 2024, China approved new coal-fired power plants at a record pace. The contradictory gap between China's stated commitments and its physical infrastructure investments is not a detail - it is the central fact of global climate arithmetic.

No amount of sacrifice by developed-nation citizens or taxpayers can compensate for this arithmetic reality. The question worth asking is why international climate conversation so rarely acknowledges it.

The COP31 Presidency's Revealing Reality

The irony of the Paris meeting is difficult to ignore. COP31 will be held in Antalya, Turkey, this November - with Turkey holding the presidency. At the same meeting where Stiell called for accelerating the renewables transition, Turkey's own energy minister confirmed that bringing the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant - a Russian-built, Rosatom-operated facility - online in 2026 remains Turkey's top energy priority.

Turkey is not pursuing energy purity. It is pursuing electricity security through diversification that includes nuclear power. This is entirely rational. But it stands in sharp contrast to the message Turkey is simultaneously delivering to the rest of the world as COP31 president.

What Sound Energy Policy Actually Looks Like

The lesson of the Iran war energy shock is not that renewables should replace fossil fuels faster. It is that over-dependence on any single source - whether Middle Eastern oil or Chinese-manufactured solar panels - creates systemic vulnerability.

A realistic energy policy acknowledges that hydrocarbons will remain essential not only as fuels, but as the feedstock for fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, plastics, and the renewable energy equipment itself. This is not a counsel of despair. It is a call for intellectual honesty - and for policies built on physical reality rather than political symbolism.

Advertisement

Carbon symbiosis, not carbon elimination, is the framework that matches the complexity of the world we actually live in.

Conclusion

Simon Stiell's Paris declaration is understandable as a political message ahead of COP31. But energy policy made in the heat of geopolitical crisis, dressed in the language of climate urgency, deserves the same scrutiny we would apply to any other form of crisis opportunism.

The Iran war has reminded the world how fragile energy supply chains can be. The right response is resilience through diversity - not acceleration toward a monoculture of intermittent electricity that cannot, by itself, power the civilization we depend upon, or provide the transportation fuels and products that are the foundation of our economy and way of life.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published by America Out Loud News.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Ronald Stein is co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book Clean Energy Exploitations. He is a policy advisor on energy literacy for the Heartland Institute, and the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and a national TV commentator on energy & infrastructure with Rick Amato.

Yoshihiro Muronaka holds a PE.Jp and is a chemical engineer who currently focuses on evaluating net-zero and decarbonization policies, advocating alternative energy concepts such as "carbon symbiosis", and promoting balanced international energy cooperation.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Ronald Stein
All articles by Yoshihiro Muronaka

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ronald SteinRonald SteinPhoto of Yoshihiro MuronakaYoshihiro Muronaka
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy