Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Let’s turn back time, Albo

By John Mikkelsen - posted Wednesday, 15 April 2026


Our Prime Minister in one of his frequently mundane news conferences recently reminded us that “we can’t turn back the clock” when it comes to issues like multiculturalism and economic reform.

Well maybe the PM in his DJ Albo guise had  a couple of lines from his idol Taylor Swift’s Shake it Off in mind:“I never miss a beat, I'm lightnin' on my feet, And that's what they don't see, mm-mm…”

At least he didn’t fall off the stage this time, but many of us are old enough to remember when we had incredible music from the likes of The Beatles, Deep Purple and the Rolling Stones. Or climb on board with Cher’s Turn Back Time to the Fabulous Fifties with Elvis, Gene Vincent, Chuck Berry and their contemporaries who set the scene for even greater times to come. 

Advertisement

Music aside, before we embraced the concept of  all-encompassing “climate change” in recent years, we  produced and refined most of our own oil and fuel, our energy bills were among the world’s cheapest thanks to an abundance of reliable coal-fired power stations, our steel mills and aluminium smelters could run profitably without the multi- billions of dollars  in government subsidies handed out recently, we manufactured our own urea to fertilise essential food crops, and we didn’t smother an area bigger than Tasmania with Chinese-sourced and more heavily-subsidised solar panels and wind turbines which are pushing power prices through the roof.

We also manufactured our own glass, plastics and paper, which are now also dependent on overseas imports along with our dwindling fuel supplies, the latter thanks to the on-going war in the Middle East which governments present and past should have foreseen as a powder keg waiting to erupt. And we didn’t have rampant antisemitism or any other huge racial divides creating traffic chaos in capital cities most weekends and culminating in the slaughter of 15 innocent Jewish citizens at Bondi on December 14 last year.

So sorry Albo, if we can’t turn back the clock by waking up to reality and diverting some of those $$$billions in subsidised green dreams to fast-tracking domestic oil recovery and refining or utilising known techniques for producing oil from coal such as South Africa does, or re-visiting the vast oil shale deposits near my old stamping grounds of Gladstone, we are all much worse off.

(Your new deal to secure some refined fuel from Singapore in exchange for our LPG is a tenuous stop-gap measure at best, as Singapore is dependent on crude oil imports mostly from the Middle East.)

 Add the irrational  ban on reliable nuclear energy now  being increasingly adopted by other OECD nations, to that long list of fails.

The obsession which you and your Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen have with staying on track to the fabled goal of “Net Zero” was also highlighted recently by signing up to the new Euro Free Trade Deal which ties us to meeting our obligations under the previously mainly aspirational Paris Accord.

Advertisement

This was highlighted by Sky News Australia's commentator Peta Credlin the same day that Bowen had adamantly denied it during an interview with her colleague, Kieran Gilbert.

“I pointed out that the EU trade deal could well be set up as a back-door way to enforce compliance with UN climate targets,” Ms Credlin said. “By God, Chris Bowen is slippery, isn't he? Slippery – and either deliberately lying about what's in the agreement, or wilfully ignorant of the detail. “If you look carefully at the DFAT website, the government's own trade website, you will find this document titled ‘Australia-European Union free trade agreement – benefits for trade, environment and climate’. “And off the top, it says this, ‘for the first time in a free trade agreement, Australia (and the EU) has made a binding commitment to implement obligations under the Paris Agreement on climate change.’”

Google’s AI is in agreement:

The concluded EU-Australia Free Trade Agreement(March 2026) includes legally binding commitments to implement the Paris Agreementon climate change. This makes climate obligations, along with labor rights, enforceable through the trade deal's dispute settlement mechanism, representing a significant integration of environmental policy into trade law…

 

●      "Essential Elements" Status: The Agreement treats compliance with the Paris Agreement similarly to human rights obligations, incorporating them as "essential elements" of the deal.

●      Green Trade Incentives: The pact immediately eliminates tariffs on environmental goods such as solar components...

Further to that Mr Bowen, it’s also confirmed on the European Commission’s own website:

●      "Boosting more sustainable trade through strong, enforceable provisions on Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD), including commitments to the Paris Climate Agreement, core labour standards, gender equality and environment."

The trade deal was also strongly criticized by several key agricultural leaders. Google’s AI again:

Agricultural leaders in Australia have strongly criticised the newly announced free trade agreement (FTA) between Australia and the European Union (EU), signed in March 2026, labelling it a "subpar" and "appalling" deal that fails to deliver meaningful market access for local producers.

Following eight years of negotiations, peak industry bodies have argued that the deal severely disadvantages Australian red meat, sugar, and dairy farmers, with some leaders suggesting they would have been better off without it.

Key Reasons for Agricultural criticism:

●      Subpar Access for Red Meat: Beef and lamb producers slammed the agreement for failing to meet industry demands, with access quotas falling nearly 40 per cent short of what was requested. Cattle Australia chair Garry Edwards labelled the agreed export volumes "pathetic," arguing that they "barely restore" what existed before 2019.

●      "One-Way" Trade Deal: The National Farmers' Federation (NFF) expressed concern that the deal offers little for Australian exports while opening the domestic market to heavily subsidised European meat, cheese, and dairy products.

●      Failed Sugar Access: The sugar industry described the outcome as a "complete failure," with access gains failing to match what competitors like Brazil secured in their EU deals.

●      Geographical Indications Restrictions: Dairy producers are frustrated by having to phase out the use of common product names like Feta, Romano, and Gruyere, while losing protection against imported European products.

Given all the above, I was amazed to have Question Time playing on the TV while I went about other tasks when  all this was brewing, and totally expected the Opposition would try to haul Albo and Bowen over the coals for their duplicity. But no, apart from Labor MPs’ Dorothy Dixers and the customary back-patting, all I heard over several days from the Conservatives were repetitive questions about how many servos had run out of fuel and how many fuel ships were on their way here.

Apologies if I dozed off from the monotony and missed anything, but I think it was more a case of “look the other way or we’ll be reminded of signing us up to the Paris Accord back in 2016 under Malcolm Turnbull…”

And that’s true, the old Miserable Ghost himself at the helm. He also had the brainwave of committing us to the infamous Snowy 2 project using power to pump water uphill to generate less power when it runs back downhill. That has ballooned from an initial estimate of $2 billion to a current estimate of $12 billion, with some experts predicting it could be as high as $20 billion if it ever gets completed!

Good one Malcolm. No wonder your constant criticism of the party that turfed you from office but still accepts you as a member, doesn't hold much water these days.

After all this, my mind has taken another trip back to a tune that I doubt is on DJ Albo’s dodgy playlist but which the Opposition could learn from  - Bob Hudson’s  1970’s  hit, The Newcastle Song  and its chorus "Don't you ever let a chance go by, Oh Lord, Don’t you ever let a chance go by…

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Mikkelsen is a long term journalist, former regional newspaper editor, now freelance writer. He is also the author of Amazon Books memoir Don't Call Me Nev.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Mikkelsen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Mikkelsen
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy