Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hoplophobia – our national illness

By David Leyonhjelm - posted Thursday, 12 February 2026


Howard used his political capital and control of the purse strings to coerce his party, Coalition partners, the media, and each state and territory government, to cooperate with a plan to restrict firearms, particularly semi-automatics. The details were helpfully supplied by a group of anti-gun activists who had been waiting for just such an opportunity.

Post hoc assessments were classic truthiness – people wanted to believe the new gun laws made a difference, and it sounded like it ought to be true, so they began with that conclusion. Some claimed there had been no more mass shootings, until there were.

Data from the ABS told a different story – the murder rate had been slowly declining prior to the introduction of the gun laws, and continued to decline at the same rate. But the conclusions were repeated so often they were rarely questioned. Hoplophobia had set in; facts didn’t matter.

Advertisement

Three decades later, hoplophobia is now deeply entrenched among policy makers, opinion leaders, politicians and the media. This is manifest in various ways.

Tougher gun laws are said to result in fewer guns “on the streets”, although most guns on the streets belong to the increasingly heavily armed police. Legally owned private guns are locked away, as the law requires.

Advocates calling for “tougher” gun laws cannot nominate what that means. Some propose restrictions that already exist, or bans on guns that don’t exist (e.g. semi-automatic revolvers or belt-fed shotguns). They think black guns are assault rifles.

Driven by their phobia, what they really want is a total ban. But don’t mention police weapons, or the Beau Lamarre-Condon case.

Completely harmless guns are banned merely because they look like military weapons. That includes water squirters and gel blasters.

Bureaucrats encourage police to use minor transgressions (e.g. non-compliant storage) to cancel licences and reduce the number of guns in the community, and there are pointless limits imposed on the total number of guns that can be owned.

Advertisement

While claiming nobody living in a metropolitan area needs a gun, politicians and the media celebrate the success of Australian shooters in the Olympic Games. Most sporting shooters and hunters live in cities.

People are taken seriously when they claim they feel safer knowing there are no guns in a house, a street or a suburb, as if the guns are plotting something bad.

A national firearms database is claimed to be desperately needed, although gun registration only affects the law-abiding and has probably never saved a single life.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published on Liberty Itch.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Leyonhjelm is a former Senator for the Liberal Democrats.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Leyonhjelm

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Leyonhjelm
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy