Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The different worlds of wealthy nations and developing countries

By Ronald Stein and Vijay Jayaraj - posted Thursday, 13 November 2025


The building of EV's has two distinctive features, the motor and battery, that requires about 500% more specialty metals and minerals that are mined, refined, and transported around the globe using hydrocarbons, as well as more energy-intensive aluminum in the vehicle body to offset the weight of a typically half-ton EV battery.

There is, similarly, a huge increase in critical metals needed to fabricate wind and solar hardware, compared with conventional fossil fuel electricity production. That translates into far more mining of earth natural resources, which is not green, regardless of labels and aspirations-and often done in poorer, less regulated countries where human rights violations and environmental degradation are all too common.

No energy system is "renewable", because all machines that access, convert, move, and store energy-drilling rigs, dams, mining trucks, wind turbines, solar panels, trains, boats, planes, pipelines, batteries, electronics, and beyond-wear out, produce waste, and require replacement and disposal of materials, some of which can be hazardous.

Advertisement

Recycling consumes energy, takes time, is limited in terms of useful recovery, and is often more expensive than producing something new. That is why the idea of a "circular economy" with near-perfect recycling is profoundly unrealistic, and even with aggressive recycling, there remains the challenge of new supplies needed to meet net new demands that come with growing economies.

Society needs simultaneously: products and electricity that are affordable and reliable for the 8 billion on this planet. Energy for the 21st Century and that minimizes overall environmental impacts. The real impediments to progress are an underlying obliviousness to energy realities and associated denial of trade-offs.

Furthermore, the impact on land, materials, and water tends to:

  • Decrease with denser forms of energy such as hydrocarbons and nuclear, and
  • Increase with less dense energy such as wind, solar, biomass, and batteries.

Delivering useful energy to society is made possible by technologies that can capture natural forces and materials and convert them into a useful form.

Forecasting long-term possibilities for supplies of products and electricity are thus determined by future innovations that can take advantage of the underlying scale of those primary natural resources. Scientific estimates of those quantities illuminate the reality that enormous amounts of energy may exist in the natural world around us for several centuries, but quantifiable, they're without replacement of those natural resources on this 4-billion-year-old planet earth.

Advertisement

The central challenge of our time is thus illuminated by the simple fact that about one fourth of the world's population accounts for three-fourths of global GDP. Our goal for the coming century should be to ensure that the whole population, both the less fortunate in already developed countries as well as those in emerging and developing nations, can obtain the material wealth and social conditions enabled by low-cost, abundant and affordable energy, and in so doing have the economic wherewithal to invest in environmental protection. That will require significantly more energy to address the needs of ALL 8 billion on this planet.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published by America Out Loud News.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Ronald Stein is co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book Clean Energy Exploitations. He is a policy advisor on energy literacy for the Heartland Institute, and the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and a national TV commentator on energy & infrastructure with Rick Amato.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds a master's degree in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia, U.K. His focus area is on the intersection of environment, energy policy and development, particularly in developing countries.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Ronald Stein
All articles by Vijay Jayaraj

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ronald SteinRonald SteinPhoto of Vijay JayarajVijay Jayaraj
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy