Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

We are more likely to lie over the phone than in an email

By Jeff Hancock, Jennifer Thom-Santelli and Thompson Ritchie - posted Tuesday, 13 July 2004


Our study shows that telephone interactions, which are distributed, synchronous and recordless, had the greatest rate of deception. Face-to-face interactions, which are synchronous and recordless but not distributed, involved the next highest rate of deception, while email, which is distributed but not synchronous or recordless, had the lowest rate of deception. Instant messaging, which did not differ in the rate of lying from face-to-face interactions, is distributed and nearly synchronous, but is recorded in a log file.

Our study suggests that the design of communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and the telephone, has an impact on everyday lying behaviour. It is important to note that these technologies are not obscure, or limited to only highly sophisticated users, but instead are used by millions of people across the globe on a daily basis. As such, these data have important implications for those of us who use these technologies to accomplish our everyday communicative activities at work and at home. In particular, the results indicate that we are more likely to lie (and to be lied to) on the telephone than in any other medium, and to lie the least in email.

What guidance does this research offer for developers and managers? Our findings suggest that specific design features can be used to influence rates of everyday forms of deception. For example, if the objective in a given situation is to reduce overall deception during social interactions, then a communication medium should be used that is asynchronous and recordable. Also, technologies that specify the user’s current physical activity, such as videoconferencing, should reduce deception by reinstating the constraints of co-presence. If, for whatever reason, the goal is to facilitate deception, then our model suggests these factors should be reversed.

Advertisement

According to recent studies, mutual trust develops most slowly in text-based interactions. Our experiment suggests that, somewhat ironically, participants lied least frequently in text-based interactions, especially email. How this irony will resolve itself over time is an interesting question. Will people begin to lie more frequently as they become more comfortable with text-based media? Or, as communication via text becomes increasingly ubiquitous, will people come to trust others more readily in their text-based interactions? Research that examines how the design of everyday communication technologies affects these types of interpersonal processes will become increasingly important as these technologies continue to support more and more of our social interactions.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Margaret-Ann Williams.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Dr Jeff Hancock is an Assistant Professor in Cornell University’s Department of Communication. His main interest is human communication and language use, especially computer-mediated interactions. He is also interested in non-literal forms of language, such as verbal irony.

Jennifer Thom-Santelli is a graduate student in Cornell University’s Department of Communication.

Thompson Ritchie is a graduate student at Cornell University’s Department of Communication.

Related Links
Cornell University's Department of Communication
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy