Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Earth has limited natural resources to continually support the generation of electricity

By Ronald Stein and Cleveland Jones - posted Tuesday, 1 April 2025


  • 26 pounds of lithium
  • 10 pounds of cobalt
  • 110 pounds of nickel
  • 9 pounds of manganese
  • 55 pounds of copper
  • 44 pounds of aluminum
  • 154 pounds of graphite
  • Plus, steel, plastic, and other metals for the battery casing.

It should concern everyone that all those "blood minerals", mostly from developing countries, come from mining at locations in the world that are never inspected or seen by policymakers and EV buyers.

Advertisement

The current rates of extraction of natural resources, such as coal, gas, lithium, cobalt, etc., to support the generation of electricity, are clearly unsustainable. Humanity is unable to replace those natural resources on Planet Earth, and obviously, the production sources will eventually run out.

At current rates of extraction of natural resources, the technically and economically available world resource base may be sucked dry in a few centuries, but our 4-billion-year-old Planet Earth will continue to exist in the solar system, with or without humans.

Before policymakers in the few wealthy countries disrupted the delivery of electricity with overly strict regulations, preferential subsidies, and cancellation of proven baseload sources like coal, nuclear and even natural gas, they should have solidified other sources, to ensure that the availability of affordable electricity would not be disrupted for consumers.

Those policymakers seem to be oblivious to the fact that at least 80 percent of humanity, or more than six billion in this world, are living on less than $10 a day, and billions living with little to no access to electricity. Today, politicians in the few wealthy countries are pursuing energy policies that promote the most expensive, intermittent and inefficient electricity generation.

A very strong incentive driving the current "nuclear renaissance" around the world is that nuclear generation provides continuous, uninterruptible and emissions-free electricity, and uses the LEAST amount of earth's resources to generate affordable electricity. With breeder reactors and recycling of nuclear waste, nuclear generation could become a viable solution to provide electricity for much of the world's population of eight billion people, far into the future.

The so-called "nuclear waste" is in fact only slightly used nuclear fuel (SUNF), since only about 3% of its energy potential is consumed before it is classified as "waste". Thus, we are burying or otherwise disposing of fuel which still has 97% of its potential for generating electricity, which represents a game-changing opportunity for providing the world with new, clean and affordable base electricity generation.

Advertisement

Today, the world has amassed approximately 90,000 tons (a volume that can fit in a large Walmart store-sized building) of SUNF. However, no "burial" solution is yet realistically proposed by the Federal Government.

  • Storage: there is enough SUNF in storage to power the entire USA for centuries to come, and enough depleted uranium in storage to last for several thousand years, at today's US electricity production rate.
  • Production: more SUNF is produced per year from existing light water nuclear power plants (that power only about 20% of the US demand), than would be needed to power the entire US with electricity from fast breeder reactors utilizing that same SUNF. The US urgently needs to convert its nuclear power system to fast breeder reactors and eventually decommission existing nuclear power plants.

Obviously, the unsustainable extraction of the earth's most accessible and inexpensive fossil fuels, which are used to produce more than 6,000 essential products and transportation fuels, as well as the minerals and metals necessary to go "green", will deplete the "bank". Thus, there is a need to seek a sustainable, long-term energy source to generate electricity, utilizing the earth's energy resources in the most efficient way, and using the LEAST amount of earth's energy resources.

In this context, it is easy to understand the current nuclear renaissance. Nuclear generation of electricity is an imperative, in order to ensure that the world uses its energy resources in the most responsible, efficient and beneficial way. SUNF and fast breeder reactors are the best chance for the world to provide the planet's population with continuous, clean, inexpensive and emissions-free electricity.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published at America Out Loud.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Ronald Stein is co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book Clean Energy Exploitations. He is a policy advisor on energy literacy for the Heartland Institute, and the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and a national TV commentator on energy & infrastructure with Rick Amato.

Cleveland M Jones PhD is technical director and partner at Fronteira Energia, a consultant, and researcher at Instituto Nacional de Óleo e Gás/CNPq/UERJ/Brazil, and was founder and director of several environmental and biotech firms.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Ronald Stein
All articles by Cleveland Jones

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ronald SteinRonald SteinPhoto of Cleveland JonesCleveland Jones
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy