Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Everything constructed can be deconstructed

By Mamtimin Ala - posted Wednesday, 25 September 2024


Many feminists consider this system oppressive, unfair, and even abnormal. They believe the nuclear family reflects patriarchalism, forming the basis for socialisation within the context of this hierarchal power structure, justifying the systematic oppression of women. Within this context, they further perceive the family as teaching children gender roles to perpetuate gender roles in broader society, delaying and harming the establishment of gender equality. Without deconstructing this structure, women’s emancipation and social justice are impossible.

Transgender activists take this deconstruction to the next level, propagating that gender identity is a self-perceptive, indeed subjective, “fact,” but not a biologically determined or determinable factor. Some further stipulate that no biological objectivity should be allowed to define gender identity as it sustains such a narrow, exclusive, and dangerous binary structure.

Is there anything left to define a human being objectively? Previously, we were defined by our psychological components, religion, culture, or nation. However, in social constructivism and deconstructivism, these notions are gradually being questioned and understood as inadequate and oppressive within overt and covert frameworks of social constructs. Our identity, in this context, is not a fixed point but a fluid reality, an endless simulation process, an expression of self-perception and self-definition. It is a self-liberating construct—it allows us to define ourselves not by traditional, social, or rational categories but by how we feel about ourselves: I am how I feel myself. I should not be presumptuously stereotyped into a previously socially accepted taxonomy as a definition of somebody.

Advertisement

Transhumanism takes this discussion to an extreme and perhaps ultimate level. It is a new philosophical and scientific movement advocating for advanced technologies to enhance our physical and cognitive abilities by creating a hybrid human species with a combination of AI and human body, i.e., human brains. While sounding like a science fiction novel, this is what Elon Musk is promoting and investing in, promoted as the future of humanity. This future defines humanity as a half-biological and half-artificial, i.e., a half-human and half-machine beast. The most worrisome aspect of this post-human condition is that all fundamental aspects of our human reality, emotions, desires, and idiosyncrasies as the basis of our highly subjective existence, may either be reconstructed or re-engineered into something new or unhuman.

We are heading toward a destination where what is historically constructed is socially de-constructible, and what is socially de-constructible is, in turn, technologically reconstructable. The aim is to create an unprecedented and revolutionary new human species for the “greater good.”  

In the future age of transhumanism, AI may make everything objectified, rationalised, and universalised. It may irreversibly synthesise all dichotomies that “bother” us. Furthermore, without or with engineered emotions, desires, and whims, we will all become homogeneously de-individualised, permanently imprisoned in a gigantic universal intelligence, and systematically remotely controlled as cyborgs by losing our humanness strangely and certainly.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Mamtimin Ala is an Australian Uyghur based in Sydney, and holds the position of President of the East Turkistan Government in Exile. He is the author of Worse than Death: Reflections on the Uyghur Genocide, a seminal work addressing the critical plight of the Uyghurs. For insights and updates, follow him on Twitter: @MamtiminAla.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mamtimin Ala

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mamtimin Ala
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy