Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The job's in front of them

By Geoff Carmody - posted Monday, 2 September 2024


At present, many Australian governments seem lost in ideological mantras. All talk, little walk.

They seem to ignore reality even while reality is catching them out.

Everybody cops the costs of their policy mistakes. Already have.

Advertisement

Ideological ministers are numerous. Here's just one who should know better.

At the Federal level, Andrew Leigh is currently assistant minister for competition, charities and treasury. He's also assistant minister for employment.

These are most serious responsibilities.

Yet he's also author of the childish 'three-eyed koalas' cartoon/meme opposing nuclear fission as a low emissions, 24/7 reliable, power source. No gravitas – let alone objective analysis – there.

Inter alia, he's also author of a book titled The Shortest History of Economics.

I like short economic histories.

Advertisement

I especially like those emphasising how policies need to allow for market responses to them.

Here's my 'shortest history of economics' (in 42 words, not Andrew Leigh's 224 pages).

In economics, if you don't know this, then, sorry, you don't know anything.

It applies, inter alia, to 'Robin Hood' tax grabs. You'd have to be pretty green to propose these.

Goods and services scarce, not free.
Demand and supply set price and quantity.
Buyers and sellers are not sitting ducks.
React to incentives changing results.
Ignore this at your peril won't change what I've said.
Markets reflect it take that as read.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody is Director, Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He favours a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy