Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The only funding model Gonski ever got

By Chris Curtis - posted Thursday, 11 July 2024


The base factor would be $354,540 for all but the smallest primary school and $1,418,160 for a secondary school in 2024.

The base factor would be paid to government schools only in recognition of the government's duty to provide schools throughout the country, a duty the non-government sector does not have.

A non-government primary school with 400 students would need to charge fees of $886 per student to compensate for the fact that it was not eligible for base funding.

Advertisement

A non-government secondary school with 800 students would need to charge fees of $1,773 per student to compensate for the fact that it was not eligible for base funding.

Schools that wanted to charge more in fees would be free to do so, but their student learning entitlement would be reduced.

In addition, there would be loadings for disadvantage, as there are now, for all students with extra needs, irrespective of the school they attended.

Finally – and separately from whatever model is applied – we need to remove the basis for the dishonest argument that the federal government pays 80 per cent of non-government schools' entitlements but only 20 per cent of government schools' entitlements. This is factual, but still dishonest. The dishonesty arises because the argument always ignores the much greater favouring of government schools in the states' funding arrangements. The solution is simple. The federal government should pay 30 per cent of the entitlement of every school, government and non-government, and the state government should pay 70 per cent of the entitlement of every school, government and non-government.

The whole point of the model is to reduce educationally damaging social stratification in Australia's schools while preserving parents' right to decide which school best meets the needs of their own children.

It is not too late for the federal, state and territory governments to adopt such a model. In fact, it is essential that they do so if their claims about reducing social stratification in our schools and lifting overall educational performance are to be taken seriously

Advertisement

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Curtis is the last state vice president of the Victorian Democratic Labor Party, the original one, not the current party with the "u" in "Labour", and a former teacher and university tutor who has retained an interest in education.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Curtis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Chris Curtis
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy