Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Internet bureaucrats protect us against everything except online crime

By Graham Young - posted Thursday, 30 May 2024


Petty scam, identity thefts galore

I'm sure you've personally been offered the scam that was perpetrated-a big smiling face of Mel Gibson, or a similarly high-profile celebrity with an appeal to an older demographic, accompanied by words implying they have a financial secret and you will never have to work again. Story continues below advertisement

Despite being a connoisseur of online scams with a track record for stringing scammers along and wasting their time I've never been tempted to click on this one-it seems like a fairly boilerplate kind of scam. But apparently it works, with victims losing an average of A$5,882 (US$3,880) each.

That's a bit more than petty theft and seems to me to qualify as a larger online harm than a bit of bullying, or some abuse, or God forbid, contradicting the government.

Advertisement

The scam is so obvious and ubiquitous you have to wonder why the authorities have failed to do something thus far, and also why Facebook hosts the ads.

You can't just buy an ad on Facebook, you and your ad have to go through a vetting process.

With a system like that, there is every chance that Facebook can be legally implicated in the consequences of the fraud by arguing that they benefited from them via payments from advertisers for running the ads and that, at the least, they were recklessly unconcerned as to their legitimacy.

This may give the victims an option for claiming damages, or for one of the corporate regulators to fine them enough to compensate for the losses.

But then the other scam I see consistently is friend requests from fraudulent profiles which should have never been allowed to be registered.

There's Sarah Scott from Samsung who approached me a couple of times.

Advertisement

The first time, she looked sufficiently real that I accepted, only to be told that I had won money in some purported Samsung competition. Bye bye Sarah, it could have been a lovely friendship.

There's also the odd CCP agent-invariably female, single, living in Australia, but with all ports before being Chinese.

And even panhandling preachers from India and Africa.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This article was first published in the Epoch Times.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy